From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, stefanha@redhat.com,
bobbyeshleman@gmail.com, mst@redhat.com, jasowangio@gmail.com,
eperezma@redhat.com, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 4/5] vsock/virtio: coalesce native RX write-space notifications
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 10:21:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auxHe77Kv3tS4hjJ@sgarzare-redhat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103041134.33310-5-physicalmtea@gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 12:11:33PM +0800, Jia Jia wrote:
>Each received packet can update peer credit and call sk_write_space(). A
>writer cannot consume that credit while the virtio RX worker retains the
>socket lock, so repeated native write-space notifications in one RX batch
>are unnecessary.
>
>This patch coalesces write-space notifications on the native AF_VSOCK path;
>data-ready remains per-packet here.
>
>The batching patch establishes batch ownership before its first packet.
>This lets this patch record a pending notification for that packet and
>flush it even if the packet immediately ends the batch. Deliver it while
>holding the socket lock to preserve the callback context of the existing
>receive path. A following patch changes that timing together with
>data-ready handling.
Can you report performance data related to this patch also here?
IIUC this is not giving a lot of advantage, so my question is if this
more complexity really add a value for us.
>
>Capture the native write-space callback before socket publication and
>access it through AF_VSOCK helpers. Sockmap can change the protocol,
>write-space callback, and psock marker without the socket lock. Serialize
>each batch eligibility check with sk_callback_lock; if a packet boundary
>observes a replacement, finish the batch and use the regular per-packet
>path.
>
>Packets admitted on the native path use the saved native callback at batch
>finish. Reloading a current sockmap callback would not synchronize its
>invocation with teardown; a wrapper seen before teardown need not forward
>the native wakeup after its psock is gone.
I really don't understand the goal of this patch, and why we need to
store the "native" sk_write_space.
>
>Signed-off-by: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
>---
> include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 4 +-
> include/net/af_vsock.h | 7 +++
> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 16 +++++
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++--------
> 4 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
>index 748633aa0cc81..bf28e8e32e280 100644
>--- a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
>+++ b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
>@@ -287,12 +287,14 @@ void virtio_transport_recv_pkt(struct virtio_transport *t,
> * Initialize a batch to zero before use. A non-empty batch owns @sk's socket
> * lock and the reference returned by vsock_find_connected_socket_net(). The
> * caller retains both until it calls virtio_transport_rx_batch_finish(). An
>- * empty batch owns neither.
>+ * empty batch owns neither. A pending native write-space notification belongs
>+ * to the lock holder and is delivered by virtio_transport_rx_batch_finish().
> */
> struct virtio_transport_rx_batch {
> struct sock *sk;
> unsigned int pkts;
> size_t bytes;
>+ bool write_space_pending;
> };
>
> static inline bool
>diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
>index 5549298c1ec6b..b76ab565ea58b 100644
>--- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
>+++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
>@@ -63,6 +63,11 @@ struct vsock_sock {
> u32 peer_shutdown;
> bool sent_request;
> bool ignore_connecting_rst;
>+ /*
>+ * Captured before the socket is published. This identifies AF_VSOCK's
>+ * native write-space callback after a consumer has replaced it.
>+ */
>+ void (*native_write_space)(struct sock *sk);
>
> /* Protected by lock_sock(sk) */
> u64 buffer_size;
>@@ -78,6 +83,8 @@ s64 vsock_stream_has_data(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
> s64 vsock_stream_has_space(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
> struct sock *vsock_create_connected(struct sock *parent);
> void vsock_data_ready(struct sock *sk);
>+bool vsock_write_space_is_native(const struct sock *sk);
>+void vsock_call_native_write_space(struct sock *sk);
>
> /**** TRANSPORT ****/
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>index 44cee74519555..e39567990539f 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>@@ -958,6 +958,7 @@ static struct sock *__vsock_create(struct net *net,
> sk->sk_type = type;
>
> vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
>+ vsk->native_write_space = sk->sk_write_space;
> vsock_addr_init(&vsk->local_addr, VMADDR_CID_ANY, VMADDR_PORT_ANY);
> vsock_addr_init(&vsk->remote_addr, VMADDR_CID_ANY, VMADDR_PORT_ANY);
>
>@@ -1122,6 +1123,21 @@ void vsock_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_data_ready);
>
>+bool vsock_write_space_is_native(const struct sock *sk)
>+{
>+ const struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
>+
>+ return READ_ONCE(sk->sk_write_space) ==
>+ READ_ONCE(vsk->native_write_space);
>+}
>+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_write_space_is_native);
>+
>+void vsock_call_native_write_space(struct sock *sk)
>+{
>+ vsock_sk(sk)->native_write_space(sk);
>+}
>+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_call_native_write_space);
>+
> /* Dummy callback required by sockmap.
> * See unconditional call of saved_close() in sock_map_close().
> */
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>index f83e5b2edce35..af26344678e41 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>@@ -1865,31 +1865,55 @@ virtio_transport_rx_batch_can_continue(struct virtio_transport *t,
> !virtio_transport_rx_buf_full(vvs);
> }
>
>-/* The caller holds sk's socket lock. */
>+/* The caller holds sk's socket and callback locks. */
> static bool
>-virtio_transport_rx_batch_can_receive(struct virtio_transport *t,
>- struct sock *sk, u32 len)
>+__virtio_transport_rx_batch_can_receive(struct virtio_transport *t,
>+ struct sock *sk, u32 len)
> {
> if (!virtio_transport_rx_batch_can_continue(t, sk, len))
> return false;
>
> /*
>- * Sockmap can replace sk_prot and publish a psock without the socket lock.
>- * Check both at each packet boundary; a boundary that sees a replacement
>- * returns to the existing per-packet path.
>+ * Sockmap can replace sk_prot or sk_write_space, and publish a psock,
>+ * without the socket lock. Coalescing is safe only for the native
>+ * write-space callback, so a boundary that sees a replacement returns to
>+ * the existing per-packet path.
> */
> return READ_ONCE(sk->sk_prot) == sk->sk_prot_creator &&
>+ vsock_write_space_is_native(sk) &&
I'm confused, why for sk_prot we are doing the check here, while for
sk_write_space we need a new API?
> !virtio_transport_sock_has_psock(sk);
> }
>
>+/*
>+ * Sockmap teardown restores the native protocol and write-space callback
>+ * under sk_callback_lock. Serialize each packet admission check with those
>+ * updates.
>+ */
>+static bool
>+virtio_transport_rx_batch_can_receive(struct virtio_transport *t,
>+ struct sock *sk, u32 len)
>+{
>+ bool batchable;
>+
>+ read_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
>+ batchable = __virtio_transport_rx_batch_can_receive(t, sk, len);
>+ read_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
>+
>+ return batchable;
>+}
>+
> /*
> * The caller holds sk's socket lock. If @batchable is non-NULL, update it
> * after processing @skb to say whether a native STREAM/RW batch can continue.
>+ * When @batch is non-NULL, record a native write-space notification for batch
>+ * finish. A writer cannot consume the updated credit until this lock is
>+ * released.
> */
> static void
> virtio_transport_recv_pkt_locked(struct virtio_transport *t,
> struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk,
>- struct net *net, bool *batchable)
>+ struct net *net, bool *batchable,
>+ struct virtio_transport_rx_batch *batch)
Do we really need bot batchable and batch ?
> {
> struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
> struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
>@@ -1921,8 +1945,12 @@ virtio_transport_recv_pkt_locked(struct virtio_transport *t,
> if (vsk->local_addr.svm_cid != VMADDR_CID_ANY)
> vsk->local_addr.svm_cid = le64_to_cpu(hdr->dst_cid);
>
>- if (space_available)
>- sk->sk_write_space(sk);
>+ if (space_available) {
>+ if (batch)
>+ batch->write_space_pending = true;
>+ else
>+ sk->sk_write_space(sk);
>+ }
>
> switch (sk->sk_state) {
> case TCP_LISTEN:
>@@ -1947,7 +1975,7 @@ virtio_transport_recv_pkt_locked(struct virtio_transport *t,
> }
>
> if (batchable)
>- *batchable = virtio_transport_rx_batch_can_receive(t, sk, 0);
>+ *batchable = virtio_transport_rx_batch_can_continue(t, sk, 0);
Why this change?
> }
>
> /* We are under the virtio-vsock's vsock->rx_lock or vhost-vsock's vq->mutex
>@@ -1991,7 +2019,7 @@ void virtio_transport_recv_pkt(struct virtio_transport *t,
> goto free_pkt;
>
> lock_sock(sk);
>- virtio_transport_recv_pkt_locked(t, skb, sk, net, NULL);
>+ virtio_transport_recv_pkt_locked(t, skb, sk, net, NULL, NULL);
>
> release_sock(sk);
>
>@@ -2008,20 +2036,31 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_recv_pkt);
>
> /*
> * Release an active RX batch. A non-empty batch holds the socket lock and the
>- * reference returned by vsock_find_connected_socket_net(). An empty batch
>- * holds neither.
>+ * reference returned by vsock_find_connected_socket_net(). Deliver any
>+ * deferred native write-space notification while holding the lock, preserving
>+ * the callback context of the regular receive path. An empty batch holds
>+ * neither.
> */
> void virtio_transport_rx_batch_finish(struct virtio_transport_rx_batch *batch)
> {
>+ bool write_space_pending = batch->write_space_pending;
> struct sock *sk = batch->sk;
>
> batch->sk = NULL;
> batch->pkts = 0;
> batch->bytes = 0;
>+ batch->write_space_pending = false;
>
> if (!sk)
> return;
>
>+ /*
>+ * The packet was admitted with the native callback. Do not reload a current
>+ * callback here: sockmap can replace or remove its wrapper independently.
>+ */
>+ if (write_space_pending)
>+ vsock_call_native_write_space(sk);
>+
> release_sock(sk);
> sock_put(sk);
> }
>@@ -2080,7 +2119,8 @@ virtio_transport_rx_batch_process(struct virtio_transport *t,
> return;
> }
>
>- virtio_transport_recv_pkt_locked(t, skb, batch->sk, net, &batchable);
>+ virtio_transport_recv_pkt_locked(t, skb, batch->sk, net, &batchable,
>+ batch);
> if (!batchable) {
> virtio_transport_rx_batch_finish(batch);
> return;
>@@ -2158,16 +2198,8 @@ void virtio_transport_recv_pkt_batch(struct virtio_transport *t,
> }
>
> lock_sock(sk);
>- /*
>- * Serialize initial admission with sockmap's callback updates. Later
>- * packet boundaries recheck native state and end a batch when they
>- * observe a replacement.
>- */
>- read_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
> batchable = virtio_transport_rx_batch_can_receive(t, sk, len);
>- read_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
Can we avoid this change and do this in the previous patch?
Please avoid as much as you can change code introduced in the same series.
> if (!batchable) {
>- /* State or receive-buffer failures keep the regular lookup path. */
Why removing this comment just added by previous patch?
> if (!virtio_transport_rx_batch_can_continue(t, sk, len)) {
> release_sock(sk);
> sock_put(sk);
>@@ -2176,7 +2208,7 @@ void virtio_transport_recv_pkt_batch(struct virtio_transport *t,
>
> virtio_transport_trace_recv_pkt(hdr, &src, &dst);
> if (virtio_transport_recv_pkt_set_owner(skb, sk))
>- virtio_transport_recv_pkt_locked(t, skb, sk, net, NULL);
>+ virtio_transport_recv_pkt_locked(t, skb, sk, net, NULL, NULL);
> else
> kfree_skb(skb);
>
>--
>2.53.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-03 4:11 [PATCH net-next v5 0/5] vsock/virtio: reduce RX per-packet socket overhead Jia Jia
2026-11-03 4:11 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/5] vsock/virtio: split socket lookup from locked RX processing Jia Jia
2026-11-05 9:04 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-11-03 4:11 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/5] vsock/virtio: factor RX skb metadata budget check Jia Jia
2026-11-05 9:06 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-11-03 4:11 ` [PATCH net-next v5 3/5] vsock/virtio: amortize RX socket locking for stream packets Jia Jia
2026-11-04 19:26 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-11-05 8:16 ` Jia Jia
2026-11-05 8:57 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-11-03 4:11 ` [PATCH net-next v5 4/5] vsock/virtio: coalesce native RX write-space notifications Jia Jia
2026-11-05 9:21 ` Stefano Garzarella [this message]
2026-11-03 4:11 ` [PATCH net-next v5 5/5] vsock/virtio: defer native RX readiness notifications until batch unlock Jia Jia
2026-11-05 9:38 ` Stefano Garzarella
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-10-23 7:51 [PATCH net-next v5 0/5] vsock/virtio: reduce RX per-packet socket overhead Jia Jia
2026-10-23 7:51 ` [PATCH net-next v5 4/5] vsock/virtio: coalesce native RX write-space notifications Jia Jia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auxHe77Kv3tS4hjJ@sgarzare-redhat \
--to=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=bobbyeshleman@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=physicalmtea@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox