Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	 pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
	sdf@fomichev.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: opt loopback into instance locking
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 08:55:45 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <avNMi3x6YPOgrO-n@devvm16445.scu0.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109173902.1225585-1-kuba@kernel.org>

On 11/09, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> netdev netlink iterates over devices when dumping queues/NAPIs/qstats
> etc. and takes rtnl_lock or instance lock depending on the underlying
> device. Currently even if all the "real" devices in the system are ops
> locked we still have to take rtnl_lock for lo (only to find out
> that it doesn't even have queues or NAPIs to report).
> Opt loopback into having control path under the ops lock.
> 
> This is a pretty obvious thing to do, I've held back this
> patch because we used to only apply ops locking on physical devices.
> netkit queue leasing made a precedent for (far more complex)
> SW devices enabling ops locking. Now adding it to lo should
> not create much new bug surface.
> 
> I considered an alternative of adding a "predicate" to the iteration
> primitive so that we can skip the devices which obviously don't
> support given API (eg qstat) without any locking. But it's more
> LoC and real_num_.x_queues is not currently WRITE_ONCE()ed so
> it doesn't work too well for queues.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> ---
> v3:
>  - pre-req commit b6f74dff6d26 ("net: use two lockdep classes for
>    the netdev instance lock") was merged
>  - no change

Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-10 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-09 17:39 [PATCH net-next] net: opt loopback into instance locking Jakub Kicinski
2026-11-10 16:55 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2026-11-11  5:07 ` Wang Zhan
2026-11-11 22:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-09-18 21:04 Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=avNMi3x6YPOgrO-n@devvm16445.scu0.facebook.com \
    --to=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox