Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
To: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
	 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	 Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tcp: fix request_sock use-after-free during Fast Open accept()
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 05:13:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <avP5PfDz6WfnvckT@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <avFoNgJENLYu4t7X@v4bel>

On Mon, 09 Nov 2026 15:29:10 +0900, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
> Commit e3d95ad7da4f ("inet: avoid fastopen lock for regular accept()")
> made inet_csk_accept() check tfo_listener before taking fastopenq.lock
> to avoid taking the lock for connections that did not use Fast Open.
> 
> reqsk_fastopen_remove() clears tfo_listener while holding fastopenq.lock,
> then reads req->sk. If inet_csk_accept() concurrently observes
> tfo_listener after it has been cleared, it skips fastopenq.lock and
> drops the last reference to the request_sock. This can free the
> request_sock while reqsk_fastopen_remove() is still using it.
> 
> If the freed memory is reused for a new request_sock with req->sk ==
> NULL, the reset path in reqsk_fastopen_remove() can append the new
> request_sock to the original listener's list of requests that caused an
> RST. After the new request_sock is freed, the next append writes through
> the stale rskq_rst_tail into freed memory.
> 
> KASAN reported the following use-after-free when writing
> fastopenq->rskq_rst_tail->dl_next = req:
> 
>   BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in reqsk_fastopen_remove+0x142/0x210
>   Write of size 8 at addr ffff888108230688 by task swapper/5/0
>   ...
>   Call Trace:
>    <IRQ>
>    ...
>    reqsk_fastopen_remove+0x142/0x210
>    tcp_check_req+0x96f/0xdd0
>    ...
>    tcp_rcv_state_process+0x19c/0x26b0
>    ...
>    tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x16e/0x490
>    tcp_v4_rcv+0x14a0/0x1af0
>    ...
>    ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x39/0x1e0
>    ip_local_deliver_finish+0x124/0x1e0
>    ip_local_deliver+0xfb/0x1e0
>    ...
>    </IRQ>
> 
> To widen the race windows, mdelay(5) was added after newsk = req->sk,
> mdelay(20) after the if (req) reqsk_put(req) block, and mdelay(100)
> after tcp_rsk(req)->tfo_listener = false. The KASAN report above was
> reproduced with this kernel.
> 
> For the lockless check, use tcp_sk(newsk)->syn_fastopen_child instead of
> tfo_listener, which reqsk_fastopen_remove() clears.
> 
> syn_fastopen_child is a field of the Fast Open child TCP socket
> referenced by newsk, not of the request_sock. It is set before the child
> socket is added to the accept queue. The paths that call
> reqsk_fastopen_remove() in response to a remote ACK or RST do not clear
> this field.
> 
> inet_csk_accept() uses this field to take fastopenq.lock only for Fast
> Open child sockets and rechecks tfo_listener while holding the lock.
> Connections that did not use Fast Open continue to avoid the lock.
> 
> Other bitfields sharing the same byte can be modified concurrently, so
> annotate the lockless read of syn_fastopen_child with data_race().
> 
> Fixes: e3d95ad7da4f ("inet: avoid fastopen lock for regular accept()")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> index e56beec438773..e5e7b844fed44 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> @@ -683,7 +683,8 @@ struct sock *inet_csk_accept(struct sock *sk, struct proto_accept_arg *arg)
>  	newsk = req->sk;
>  
>  	if (sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_TCP &&
> -	    tcp_rsk(req)->tfo_listener) {
> +	    /* Stable while reqsk removal can race; adjacent bitfields may change. */
> +	    data_race(!!tcp_sk(newsk)->syn_fastopen_child)) {

Are data_race() and !! necessary ?


>  		spin_lock_bh(&queue->fastopenq.lock);
>  		if (tcp_rsk(req)->tfo_listener) {
>  			/* We are still waiting for the final ACK from 3WHS
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-11  5:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-09  6:29 [PATCH net] tcp: fix request_sock use-after-free during Fast Open accept() Hyunwoo Kim
2026-11-11  5:13 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2026-11-11  5:43   ` Hyunwoo Kim
2026-11-11  5:54     ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-11-11  6:05       ` Hyunwoo Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=avP5PfDz6WfnvckT@google.com \
    --to=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=imv4bel@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox