From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
To: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] tcp: fix NULL pointer dereference when restarting a Fast Open listener
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 05:48:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avQBWJFGoi9Dp9uA@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <avMkfJrXhCFXn8M_@v4bel>
On Tue, 10 Nov 2026 23:04:44 +0900, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
> When a valid RST is received for a Fast Open child accepted before the
> three-way handshake completes, reqsk_fastopen_remove() adds the
> request_sock to the listener's RST list if the listener is in TCP_LISTEN.
>
> An application can call shutdown(SHUT_RD) on a listener socket.
> inet_csk_listen_stop() checks rskq_rst_head without holding
> fastopenq.lock. If rskq_rst_head is NULL, it does not acquire the lock
> and therefore does not synchronize with an insertion by
> reqsk_fastopen_remove() after that function has passed the TCP_LISTEN
> check.
>
> The more likely outcome of this race, even without a subsequent
> listen(), is a leak. If reqsk_fastopen_remove() inserts a request_sock
> after inet_csk_listen_stop() observes an empty list and returns, the
> request_sock is stranded in rskq_rst_head and keeps a reference on the
> listener. The socket is already in TCP_CLOSE, so a subsequent close()
> does not call inet_csk_listen_stop() again.
>
> If listen() is called again on the same socket before the delayed list
> insertion, the insertion can overlap the queue initialization in
> reqsk_queue_alloc(). If it occurs after rskq_rst_head is set to NULL but
> before rskq_rst_tail is set to NULL, rskq_rst_head points to the
> request_sock while rskq_rst_tail is NULL.
>
> When a valid RST is later received for another accepted Fast Open child,
> rskq_rst_head is not NULL, so reqsk_fastopen_remove() attempts to write
> the request_sock pointer to rskq_rst_tail->dl_next while rskq_rst_tail is
> NULL. KASAN reports:
>
> BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in reqsk_fastopen_remove+0x147/0x210
> Write of size 8 at addr 0000000000000088 by task swapper/3/0
> ...
> Call Trace:
> <IRQ>
> ...
> reqsk_fastopen_remove+0x147/0x210
> tcp_check_req+0xa70/0x1060
> ...
> tcp_rcv_state_process+0x1cb/0x2ae0
> ...
> tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x1fe/0x740
> tcp_v4_rcv+0x1744/0x2070
> ...
> ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x5c/0x280
> ip_local_deliver_finish+0x171/0x330
> ip_local_deliver+0x107/0x370
> ...
> </IRQ>
>
> To widen the race window, the issue was reproduced after adding
> mdelay(3000) immediately after reqsk_fastopen_remove() checks that the
> listener is in TCP_LISTEN and immediately after reqsk_queue_alloc() sets
> rskq_rst_head to NULL.
>
> Make inet_csk_listen_stop() acquire fastopenq.lock regardless of the
> value of rskq_rst_head and detach the list while holding the lock. With
> this synchronization, reqsk_fastopen_remove() either inserts the
> request_sock before inet_csk_listen_stop() acquires the lock, in which
> case inet_csk_listen_stop() reclaims it, or sees that the listener is
> not in TCP_LISTEN and does not insert anything.
>
> Fixes: 0536fcc039a8 ("tcp: prepare fastopen code for upcoming listener changes")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 14:04 [PATCH net v2] tcp: fix NULL pointer dereference when restarting a Fast Open listener Hyunwoo Kim
2026-11-11 5:48 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avQBWJFGoi9Dp9uA@google.com \
--to=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=imv4bel@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox