From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
edumazet@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, fw@strlen.de, ja@ssi.bg
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 04/15] net: ethernet: mtk_ppe: update stats on flow deletion
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2026 00:26:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avo_iwv4AZdPu2Lm@chamomile> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179462662226.2199510.18334585380250309949@kernel.org>
On Sat, Nov 14, 2026 at 03:23:42AM +0000, netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
> issue(s) to consider.
>
> Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 2 · Low: 0
>
> If you believe none of the issues are legitimate, please reply to each
> issue of Medium severity or higher and explain why the AI is wrong.
> If any of them are legitimate and you plan to respin, please let patchwork
> know by including "pw-bot: cr" as a separate line at the end of your reply
> (one such reply per series is enough).
>
> - [Medium] Bridge (L2) flows on mtk_ppe: the new destroy-time call to
> mtk_flow_offload_update_stats() read-clears the hardware MIB counter…
> - [Medium] mtk_flow_offload_destroy() takes the final MIB snapshot before
> it invalidates the hardware FOE entry, so the 'last stats sync' on…
>
> --
>
> net: ethernet: mtk_ppe: update stats on flow deletion
>
> This moves the stats collection out of mtk_flow_offload_stats() into a new
> helper, mtk_flow_offload_update_stats(). The helper is also called from
> mtk_flow_offload_destroy(), so the final hardware counters are reported
> when a flow is deleted. This follows "netfilter: flowtable: retrieve stats
> on flow deletion".
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe_offload.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe_offload.c
> > index 99b28aaa7cc47..8ca694bb5e1b7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe_offload.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe_offload.c
> > @@ -526,6 +526,24 @@ mtk_flow_offload_replace(struct mtk_eth *eth, struct flow_cls_offload *f,
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > +static void
> > +mtk_flow_offload_update_stats(struct mtk_eth *eth, struct flow_cls_offload *f,
> > + struct mtk_flow_entry *entry)
> > +{
> > + struct mtk_foe_accounting diff;
> > + u32 idle;
> > +
> > + idle = mtk_foe_entry_idle_time(eth->ppe[entry->ppe_index], entry);
> > + f->stats.lastused = jiffies - idle * HZ;
> > +
> > + if (entry->hash != 0xFFFF &&
> > + mtk_foe_entry_get_mib(eth->ppe[entry->ppe_index], entry->hash,
> > + &diff)) {
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> When a bridge (L2) flow is destroyed, can this read-clear the hardware
> counter of an unrelated flow?
Maybe, but that is a pre-existing issue.
This patch is just adapting the driver to use the new call to stats
when deleting a flow, it reuses the existing codebase.
> For a flower rule with only ETH_ADDRS, mtk_flow_offload_replace()
> allocates the entry with kzalloc_obj(), so entry->hash starts at 0.
> mtk_foe_entry_commit() then takes the L2 path:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe.c:mtk_foe_entry_commit() {
> ...
> if (type == MTK_PPE_PKT_TYPE_BRIDGE)
> return mtk_foe_entry_commit_l2(ppe, entry);
>
> hash = mtk_ppe_hash_entry(ppe->eth, &entry->data);
> entry->hash = 0xffff;
> ...
> }
>
> mtk_foe_entry_commit_l2() never sets entry->hash = 0xffff. The base L2
> entry is not on the foe_flow lists, so __mtk_ppe_check_skb() never updates
> its hash. mtk_flow_entry_update_l2() only touches the subflow hashes. As a
> result, the base entry keeps hash == 0 for its whole lifetime.
>
> That means the entry->hash != 0xFFFF check passes and
> mtk_foe_entry_get_mib(ppe, 0, &diff) runs. mtk_ppe_start() enables
> MTK_PPE_MIB_CFG_RD_CLR, so this read zeroes the MIB counter of whatever
> flow is bound at FOE index 0, for example an nf_flowtable L3 flow. Those
> packets and bytes get charged to the L2 rule and never reach their real
> owner.
>
> The bridge flow's own counters live in the subflow slots on
> entry->l2_flows, and this function never reads them. So the destroy-time
> stats for L2 flows are wrong as well.
>
> The missing 0xffff on L2 base entries is not new. Before this patch,
> though, mtk_flow_offload_destroy() never touched the MIB. Now every
> FLOW_CLS_DESTROY of a bridge flow does this read-clear, even when nobody
> requested stats for that rule.
>
> Should L2 base entries be skipped here? Alternatively, should
> mtk_foe_entry_commit_l2() set entry->hash to 0xffff?
>
> > + f->stats.pkts += diff.packets;
> > + f->stats.bytes += diff.bytes;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > static int
> > mtk_flow_offload_destroy(struct mtk_eth *eth, struct flow_cls_offload *f)
> > {
> > @@ -536,6 +554,8 @@ mtk_flow_offload_destroy(struct mtk_eth *eth, struct flow_cls_offload *f)
> > if (!entry)
> > return -ENOENT;
> >
> > + mtk_flow_offload_update_stats(eth, f, entry);
> > +
> > mtk_foe_entry_clear(eth->ppe[entry->ppe_index], entry);
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Is this snapshot really the final one for the flow?
>
> mtk_flow_offload_update_stats() read-clears MIB[entry->hash] while the
> hardware FOE entry is still in BIND state. ppe_lock is dropped between
> the two steps. The entry is only invalidated later, under ppe_lock, in
> __mtk_foe_entry_clear():
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe.c:__mtk_foe_entry_clear() {
> ...
> hwe->ib1 &= ~MTK_FOE_IB1_STATE;
> hwe->ib1 |= FIELD_PREP(MTK_FOE_IB1_STATE, MTK_FOE_STATE_INVALID);
> dma_wmb();
> mtk_ppe_cache_clear(ppe);
>
> if (ppe->accounting) {
> ...
> acct->packets = 0;
> acct->bytes = 0;
> }
> }
> entry->hash = 0xffff;
> ...
> }
>
> Between the MIB read and the invalidation, the PPE keeps forwarding and
> counting packets for this flow. That traffic never reaches f->stats. It
> stays in the hardware MIB counter, because only the software acct_table
> is zeroed here.
>
> __mtk_foe_entry_commit() doesn't clear the MIB either. So the next
> read-clear of that index charges those packets to whichever flow binds
> the slot next.
>
> This happens whenever an active flow is torn down, for example on a
> flowtable flush, a conntrack flush or a ruleset deletion.
>
> Would it work to invalidate the entry first and then drain
> MIB[saved hash]?
>
> > rhashtable_remove_fast(ð->flow_table, &entry->node,
> > mtk_flow_ht_params);
>
> [ ... ]
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20261113031251.2437074-2-pablo%40netfilter.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-15 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-13 3:12 [PATCH net-next 00/15] Netfilter updates for net-next Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-13 3:12 ` [PATCH net-next 01/15] netfilter: flowtable: do not hw offload flows in teardown state Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-13 3:17 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-11-13 3:24 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-14 3:23 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-15 23:12 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-13 3:12 ` [PATCH net-next 02/15] netfilter: flowtable: fix pmtu discovery in nf_flow_tunnel_ip6ip6_push() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-14 3:23 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-15 23:19 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-13 3:12 ` [PATCH net-next 03/15] netfilter: flowtable: retrieve stats on flow deletion Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-14 3:23 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-15 23:22 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-13 3:12 ` [PATCH net-next 04/15] net: ethernet: mtk_ppe: update " Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-14 3:23 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-15 23:26 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2026-11-13 3:12 ` [PATCH net-next 05/15] net: airoha: " Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-14 3:23 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-15 23:26 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-13 3:12 ` [PATCH net-next 06/15] netfilter: xt_time: fix monthday computation for dates past 2039 Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-14 3:23 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-13 3:12 ` [PATCH net-next 07/15] netfilter: nft_flow_offload: do not offload multicast Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-14 3:23 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-13 3:12 ` [PATCH net-next 08/15] netfilter: lwtunnel: expose read-only sysctl nf_hooks_lwtunnel for non init-netns Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-14 3:23 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-15 23:29 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-13 3:12 ` [PATCH net-next 09/15] netfilter: flowtable: purge entries immediately when destroying the flowtable Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-14 3:23 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-13 3:12 ` [PATCH net-next 10/15] selftests: netfilter: nf_queue: drop the no-op loop initializer Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-13 3:12 ` [PATCH net-next 11/15] netfilter: flowtable: do not scrub as crossing netns Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-14 3:23 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-15 23:30 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-13 3:12 ` [PATCH net-next 12/15] netfilter: flowtable: tunnel device poisons h_source of fast-path frames Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-14 3:23 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-13 3:12 ` [PATCH net-next 13/15] netfilter: flowtable: do not clear the offload bit twice Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-13 3:12 ` [PATCH net-next 14/15] netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: make skb writable before writing NFQA_L2HDR Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-13 3:12 ` [PATCH net-next 15/15] selftests: netfilter: add UDP flowtable offload test Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-11-14 3:23 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avo_iwv4AZdPu2Lm@chamomile \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox