From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <npitre@baylibre.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 2/2] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: avoid devm_alloc_etherdev, fix module removal
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 12:09:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b055cea5-6f03-4c73-aae4-09b5d2290c29@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241004041218.2809774-3-nico@fluxnic.net>
Hi Nicolas,
On 04/10/2024 07:10, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> From: Nicolas Pitre <npitre@baylibre.com>
>
> Usage of devm_alloc_etherdev_mqs() conflicts with
> am65_cpsw_nuss_cleanup_ndev() as the same struct net_device instances
> get unregistered twice. Switch to alloc_etherdev_mqs() and make sure
Do we know why the same net device gets unregistered twice?
> am65_cpsw_nuss_cleanup_ndev() unregisters and frees those net_device
> instances properly.
>
> With this, it is finally possible to rmmod the driver without oopsing
> the kernel.
>
> Fixes: 93a76530316a ("net: ethernet: ti: introduce am65x/j721e gigabit eth subsystem driver")
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <npitre@baylibre.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
> index f6bc8a4dc6..e95457c988 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
> @@ -2744,10 +2744,9 @@ am65_cpsw_nuss_init_port_ndev(struct am65_cpsw_common *common, u32 port_idx)
> return 0;
>
> /* alloc netdev */
> - port->ndev = devm_alloc_etherdev_mqs(common->dev,
> - sizeof(struct am65_cpsw_ndev_priv),
> - AM65_CPSW_MAX_QUEUES,
> - AM65_CPSW_MAX_QUEUES);
> + port->ndev = alloc_etherdev_mqs(sizeof(struct am65_cpsw_ndev_priv),
> + AM65_CPSW_MAX_QUEUES,
> + AM65_CPSW_MAX_QUEUES);
Can we solve this issue without doing this change as
there are many error cases relying on devm managed freeing of netdev.
> if (!port->ndev) {
> dev_err(dev, "error allocating slave net_device %u\n",
> port->port_id);
> @@ -2868,8 +2867,12 @@ static void am65_cpsw_nuss_cleanup_ndev(struct am65_cpsw_common *common)
>
> for (i = 0; i < common->port_num; i++) {
> port = &common->ports[i];
> - if (port->ndev && port->ndev->reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED)
> + if (!port->ndev)
> + continue;
> + if (port->ndev->reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED)
> unregister_netdev(port->ndev);
> + free_netdev(port->ndev);
> + port->ndev = NULL;
I still can't see what we are doing wrong in existing code.
> }
> }
>
> @@ -3613,16 +3616,17 @@ static int am65_cpsw_nuss_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> ret = am65_cpsw_nuss_init_ndevs(common);
> if (ret)
> - goto err_free_phylink;
> + goto err_ndevs_clear;
>
> ret = am65_cpsw_nuss_register_ndevs(common);
> if (ret)
> - goto err_free_phylink;
> + goto err_ndevs_clear;
>
> pm_runtime_put(dev);
> return 0;
>
> -err_free_phylink:
> +err_ndevs_clear:
> + am65_cpsw_nuss_cleanup_ndev(common);
> am65_cpsw_nuss_phylink_cleanup(common);
> am65_cpts_release(common->cpts);
> err_of_clear:
--
cheers,
-roger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-04 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-04 4:10 [PATCH net v3 0/2] fix ti-am65-cpsw-nuss module removal Nicolas Pitre
2024-10-04 4:10 ` [PATCH net v3 1/2] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: prevent WARN_ON upon " Nicolas Pitre
2024-10-04 8:48 ` Roger Quadros
2024-10-04 4:10 ` [PATCH net v3 2/2] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: avoid devm_alloc_etherdev, fix " Nicolas Pitre
2024-10-04 9:09 ` Roger Quadros [this message]
2024-10-04 12:57 ` Roger Quadros
2024-10-04 15:37 ` Nicolas Pitre
2024-10-04 19:50 ` Roger Quadros
2024-10-04 21:17 ` Nicolas Pitre
2024-10-05 20:26 ` Nicolas Pitre
2024-10-07 11:37 ` Roger Quadros
2024-10-07 11:37 ` Roger Quadros
2024-10-08 8:50 ` [PATCH net v3 0/2] fix ti-am65-cpsw-nuss " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b055cea5-6f03-4c73-aae4-09b5d2290c29@kernel.org \
--to=rogerq@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=npitre@baylibre.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).