netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Joonwoo Park" <joonwpark81@gmail.com>
To: "Patrick McHardy" <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] [VLAN]: Unclassified vlan packet
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 23:20:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b25c3fa70805262320h7edb4246wd017261fe7187b88@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <483B9EBE.5030703@trash.net>

2008/5/26 Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>:
> Joonwoo Park wrote:
>>
>> To be polite to the PACKET,
>> Don't kill the unclassified & hardware accelerated vlan packets if netdev
>> is in promiscuous, set packet type with PACKET_OTHERHOST. Put the vlan tag
>> into skb->cb for all hardware accelerated vlan packets.
>
> Conceptually I think this patch goes in the right direction,
> one question remaining is when to invalidate the VLAN tag again.
>
> The only solution I could come up with is invalidating it in
> netif_receive_skb() when the receiving device is not a VLAN
> device and additionally invalidating it in all callers of
> dev_queue_xmit except VLAN itself, but I would really prefer
> something less error prone without touching netif_receive_skb().
>
> BTW, I already have a patch queued to move the VLAN tag from
> skb->cb to a seperate skb member to fix the the conflict with
> qdiscs (this should also allow to use vlan accel through virtual
> network devices later on). So please don't resend, I'll integrate
> the patch on top of this change once we find a good spot for
> invalidation.
>

Thanks Patrick for reviewing.
I'll be looking forward to seeing it on the list.

Thanks,
Joonwoo

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-27  6:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-11 13:57 [PATCH 1/5] [VLAN]: Unclassified vlan packet Joonwoo Park
2008-05-27  5:40 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-05-27  6:20   ` Joonwoo Park [this message]
2008-05-27  6:30     ` Patrick McHardy
2008-05-27 17:40       ` Joonwoo Park
2008-05-27 17:48         ` Patrick McHardy
2008-05-27 18:36           ` Joonwoo Park
2008-06-01 22:16       ` Joonwoo Park
2008-06-02 12:48         ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-05 19:40           ` Patrick McHardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b25c3fa70805262320h7edb4246wd017261fe7187b88@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=joonwpark81@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).