From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Joonwoo Park" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] [VLAN]: Unclassified vlan packet Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 10:40:33 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20080411135714.GA8137@tp64> <483B9EBE.5030703@trash.net> <483BAA7F.6060408@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: "Patrick McHardy" Return-path: Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.231]:59839 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755309AbYE0Rkd (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2008 13:40:33 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l9so3052755rvb.1 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 10:40:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <483BAA7F.6060408@trash.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2008/5/26 Patrick McHardy : >>> BTW, I already have a patch queued to move the VLAN tag from >>> skb->cb to a seperate skb member to fix the the conflict with >>> qdiscs (this should also allow to use vlan accel through virtual >>> network devices later on). So please don't resend, I'll integrate >>> the patch on top of this change once we find a good spot for >>> invalidation. >>> Was that patch applied to certain tree? If it was, may I know what tree is it? > > Well, we still need to find a good spot for invalidation. > Suggestions welcome :) > huh, also I'll try to find it! :-) Thanks, Joonwoo