From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@rgmadvisors.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Subject: [PATCH net] ipv4: fix broadcast packets reception
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:42:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b2a74da9e3b01065d0244088c2038c8b6ec1d334.1458574841.git.pabeni@redhat.com> (raw)
Currently, ingress ipv4 broadcast datagrams are dropped if the
ingress interface lacks an ipv4 address. This is caused by
multiple issues:
- in udp_v4_early_demux() ip_check_mc_rcu is invoked even on
bcast packets
- ip_route_input_slow() always try to validate the source
This patch tries to address both issues, invoking ip_check_mc_rcu()
only for mcast packets and calling fib_validate_source() only
if the in_device has an address, at least.
Fixes: 6e5403093261 ("ipv4/udp: Verify multicast group is ours in upd_v4_early_demux()")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
net/ipv4/route.c | 6 +++++-
net/ipv4/udp.c | 12 ++++++++----
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index 02c6229..e86d33d 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -1867,7 +1867,11 @@ brd_input:
if (skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_IP))
goto e_inval;
- if (!ipv4_is_zeronet(saddr)) {
+ /* Do not validate the source if this device not not have an
+ * IPv4 address yet and the destination is the broadcast address.
+ */
+ if (!ipv4_is_zeronet(saddr) && (in_dev->ifa_list ||
+ !ipv4_is_lbcast(daddr))) {
err = fib_validate_source(skb, saddr, 0, tos, 0, dev,
in_dev, &itag);
if (err < 0)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index 836abe5..08eed5e 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -2070,10 +2070,14 @@ void udp_v4_early_demux(struct sk_buff *skb)
if (!in_dev)
return;
- ours = ip_check_mc_rcu(in_dev, iph->daddr, iph->saddr,
- iph->protocol);
- if (!ours)
- return;
+ /* we are supposed to accept bcast packets */
+ if (skb->pkt_type == PACKET_MULTICAST) {
+ ours = ip_check_mc_rcu(in_dev, iph->daddr, iph->saddr,
+ iph->protocol);
+ if (!ours)
+ return;
+ }
+
sk = __udp4_lib_mcast_demux_lookup(net, uh->dest, iph->daddr,
uh->source, iph->saddr, dif);
} else if (skb->pkt_type == PACKET_HOST) {
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2016-03-21 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-21 15:42 Paolo Abeni [this message]
2016-03-21 15:50 ` [PATCH net] ipv4: fix broadcast packets reception David Miller
2016-03-21 16:12 ` Paolo Abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b2a74da9e3b01065d0244088c2038c8b6ec1d334.1458574841.git.pabeni@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sbohrer@rgmadvisors.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox