Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" 
	<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel <kernel@sberdevices.ru>,
	Krasnov Arseniy <oxffffaa@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] vhost/vsock: rework packet allocation logic
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 12:09:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b2a97b32-cd91-50f1-861d-05978ccb7205@sberdevices.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220609083812.kfsmteh6cm5v3ag2@sgarzare-redhat>

On 09.06.2022 11:38, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 05:33:04AM +0000, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>> For packets received from virtio RX queue, use buddy
>> allocator instead of 'kmalloc()' to be able to insert
>> such pages to user provided vma. Single call to
>> 'copy_from_iter()' replaced with per-page loop.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
>> ---
>> drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>> index e6c9d41db1de..0dc2229f18f7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ struct vhost_vsock {
>>
>>     u32 guest_cid;
>>     bool seqpacket_allow;
>> +    bool zerocopy_rx_on;
> 
> This is per-device, so a single socket can change the behaviour of all the sockets of this device.

Sure, my mistake

> 
> Can we do something better?
> 
> Maybe we can allocate the header, copy it, find the socket and check if zero-copy is enabled or not for that socket.
> 
> Of course we should change or extend virtio_transport_recv_pkt() to avoid to find the socket again.

I think yes

> 
> 
>> };
>>
>> static u32 vhost_transport_get_local_cid(void)
>> @@ -357,6 +358,7 @@ vhost_vsock_alloc_pkt(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>>               unsigned int out, unsigned int in)
>> {
>>     struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt;
>> +    struct vhost_vsock *vsock;
>>     struct iov_iter iov_iter;
>>     size_t nbytes;
>>     size_t len;
>> @@ -393,20 +395,75 @@ vhost_vsock_alloc_pkt(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>>         return NULL;
>>     }
>>
>> -    pkt->buf = kmalloc(pkt->len, GFP_KERNEL);
>> -    if (!pkt->buf) {
>> -        kfree(pkt);
>> -        return NULL;
>> -    }
>> -
>>     pkt->buf_len = pkt->len;
>> +    vsock = container_of(vq->dev, struct vhost_vsock, dev);
>>
>> -    nbytes = copy_from_iter(pkt->buf, pkt->len, &iov_iter);
>> -    if (nbytes != pkt->len) {
>> -        vq_err(vq, "Expected %u byte payload, got %zu bytes\n",
>> -               pkt->len, nbytes);
>> -        virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
>> -        return NULL;
>> +    if (!vsock->zerocopy_rx_on) {
>> +        pkt->buf = kmalloc(pkt->len, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +
>> +        if (!pkt->buf) {
>> +            kfree(pkt);
>> +            return NULL;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        pkt->slab_buf = true;
>> +        nbytes = copy_from_iter(pkt->buf, pkt->len, &iov_iter);
>> +        if (nbytes != pkt->len) {
>> +            vq_err(vq, "Expected %u byte payload, got %zu bytes\n",
>> +                pkt->len, nbytes);
>> +            virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
>> +            return NULL;
>> +        }
>> +    } else {
>> +        struct page *buf_page;
>> +        ssize_t pkt_len;
>> +        int page_idx;
>> +
>> +        /* This creates memory overrun, as we allocate
>> +         * at least one page for each packet.
>> +         */
>> +        buf_page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, get_order(pkt->len));
>> +
>> +        if (buf_page == NULL) {
>> +            kfree(pkt);
>> +            return NULL;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        pkt->buf = page_to_virt(buf_page);
>> +
>> +        page_idx = 0;
>> +        pkt_len = pkt->len;
>> +
>> +        /* As allocated pages are not mapped, process
>> +         * pages one by one.
>> +         */
>> +        while (pkt_len > 0) {
>> +            void *mapped;
>> +            size_t to_copy;
>> +
>> +            mapped = kmap(buf_page + page_idx);
>> +
>> +            if (mapped == NULL) {
>> +                virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
>> +                return NULL;
>> +            }
>> +
>> +            to_copy = min(pkt_len, ((ssize_t)PAGE_SIZE));
>> +
>> +            nbytes = copy_from_iter(mapped, to_copy, &iov_iter);
>> +            if (nbytes != to_copy) {
>> +                vq_err(vq, "Expected %zu byte payload, got %zu bytes\n",
>> +                       to_copy, nbytes);
>> +                kunmap(mapped);
>> +                virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
>> +                return NULL;
>> +            }
>> +
>> +            kunmap(mapped);
>> +
>> +            pkt_len -= to_copy;
>> +            page_idx++;
>> +        }
>>     }
>>
>>     return pkt;
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-09 12:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-03  5:27 [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] virtio/vsock: experimental zerocopy receive Arseniy Krasnov
2022-06-03  5:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] virtio/vsock: rework packet allocation logic Arseniy Krasnov
2022-06-09  8:37   ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-06-03  5:33 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] vhost/vsock: " Arseniy Krasnov
2022-06-09  8:38   ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-06-09 12:09     ` Arseniy Krasnov [this message]
2022-06-03  5:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] af_vsock: add zerocopy receive logic Arseniy Krasnov
2022-06-09  8:39   ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-06-09 12:20     ` Arseniy Krasnov
2022-06-13  8:50       ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-06-03  5:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] virtio/vsock: add transport zerocopy callback Arseniy Krasnov
2022-06-09  8:41   ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-06-09 12:23     ` Arseniy Krasnov
2022-06-03  5:39 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] vhost/vsock: enable " Arseniy Krasnov
2022-06-03  5:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/8] virtio/vsock: " Arseniy Krasnov
2022-06-03  5:43 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] test/vsock: add receive zerocopy tests Arseniy Krasnov
2022-06-03  5:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 8/8] test/vsock: vsock rx zerocopy utility Arseniy Krasnov
2022-06-08 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] virtio/vsock: experimental zerocopy receive Zhao Liu
2022-06-09  8:54 ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-06-09 12:33   ` Arseniy Krasnov
2022-06-13  8:54     ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-06-14  4:23       ` Arseniy Krasnov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b2a97b32-cd91-50f1-861d-05978ccb7205@sberdevices.ru \
    --to=avkrasnov@sberdevices.ru \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel@sberdevices.ru \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oxffffaa@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox