From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANN] netdev development stats for 7.2
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 16:19:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b2af9d40-92f7-4943-9af0-e3f59c69e6e6@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260617115319.43a5942d@kernel.org>
On 6/17/2026 11:53 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Top scores (positive): Top scores (negative):
> 1 ( ) [768] Jakub Kicinski 1 ( +1) [91] Tariq Toukan
> 2 ( ) [376] Simon Horman 2 ( +8) [86] Wei Fang
> 3 ( ) [346] Andrew Lunn 3 ( +4) [67] Ratheesh Kannoth
> 4 ( ) [265] Paolo Abeni 4 (***) [54] javen
> 5 ( +4) [ 91] Ido Schimmel 5 ( +6) [49] Lorenzo Bianconi
> 6 (+14) [ 74] David Laight 6 (***) [48] Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
> 7 ( ) [ 62] Krzysztof Kozlowski 7 (***) [43] Simon Wunderlich
> 8 ( +2) [ 57] Aleksandr Loktionov 8 (***) [38] Chuck Lever
> 9 (+12) [ 50] Nikolay Aleksandrov 9 (+18) [38] Grzegorz Nitka
> 10 ( -4) [ 49] Willem de Bruijn 10 (***) [35] Pablo Neira Ayuso
> 11 ( +3) [ 49] Sabrina Dubroca 11 (***) [35] Markus Stockhausen
> 12 (+41) [ 47] Alexander Lobakin 12 (***) [34] Selvamani Rajagopal
> 13 (+24) [ 47] Maxime Chevallier 13 (***) [34] Jason Xing
> 14 ( -6) [ 46] David Ahern 14 ( -8) [33] Illusion Wang
> 15 (***) [ 43] Jiayuan Chen 15 (***) [30] Minxi Hou
>
> One process note on the reviewer score. Tariq tops the negative list.
> I've been returning to the question of whether it's fair since
> he has to handle submissions of most of nVidia's patches.
> Still, I don't understand why reading thru the list and reviewing
> one patchset from another company a day is too much to ask.
>
This is a difficult question. When I've covered for Tony in a similar
position, I've felt like it is hard enough to keep an eye on our own
list let alone also finding time to review other places.
A positive note here is that nVidia is now green overall, so at least
there is some participation from the company as a whole. On the other
hand, Tony isn't in the top negatives despite performing a somewhat
similar role.
I know I was lacking myself in the last cycle due to a bunch of
unrelated work and issues. I've been working to get review back into my
daily flow.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-17 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-17 18:53 [ANN] netdev development stats for 7.2 Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-17 23:19 ` Jacob Keller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b2af9d40-92f7-4943-9af0-e3f59c69e6e6@intel.com \
--to=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox