From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
sheviks <sheviks@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipvs: Guard access of HK_TYPE_KTHREAD cpumask with RCU
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 10:23:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b2fea411-de12-4e1a-bfc5-fdc14b2e29d5@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6b8f1536-444c-e75a-c4b3-d5cbe7c1786e@ssi.bg>
On 3/26/26 4:32 AM, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2026, Waiman Long wrote:
>
>> The ip_vs_ctl.c file and the associated ip_vs.h file are the only places
>> in the kernel where HK_TYPE_KTHREAD cpumask is being retrieved and used.
>> Now that HK_TYPE_KTHREAD/HK_TYPE_DOMAIN cpumask can be changed at run
>> time. We need to use RCU to guard access to this cpumask to avoid a
>> potential UAF problem as the returned cpumask may be freed before it
>> is being used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> include/net/ip_vs.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
>> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/ip_vs.h b/include/net/ip_vs.h
>> index 29a36709e7f3..17c85a575ef4 100644
>> --- a/include/net/ip_vs.h
>> +++ b/include/net/ip_vs.h
>> @@ -1155,7 +1155,7 @@ static inline int sysctl_run_estimation(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
>> return ipvs->sysctl_run_estimation;
>> }
>>
>> -static inline const struct cpumask *sysctl_est_cpulist(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
>> +static inline const struct cpumask *__sysctl_est_cpulist(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
>> {
>> if (ipvs->est_cpulist_valid)
>> return ipvs->sysctl_est_cpulist;
>> @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ static inline int sysctl_run_estimation(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
>> return 1;
>> }
>>
>> -static inline const struct cpumask *sysctl_est_cpulist(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
>> +static inline const struct cpumask *__sysctl_est_cpulist(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
>> {
>> return housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_KTHREAD);
>> }
>> @@ -1290,6 +1290,18 @@ static inline int sysctl_est_nice(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
>>
>> #endif
>>
> May be there is little fuzz here, due to the recent
> changes in the nf-next tree. If this is a bugfix due to the
> missing RCU protection, may be you should add Fixes line too
> and use the nf tree. Probably, there will be fuzz/collisions with
> the changes in the nf-next tree...
Thanks for the suggestion, I will rebase the patches on top of the
nf-next tree.
>
>> +static inline bool sysctl_est_cpulist_empty(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
>> +{
>> + guard(rcu)();
>> + return cpumask_empty(__sysctl_est_cpulist(ipvs));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline unsigned int sysctl_est_cpulist_weight(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
>> +{
>> + guard(rcu)();
>> + return cpumask_weight(__sysctl_est_cpulist(ipvs));
>> +}
>> +
>> /* IPVS core functions
>> * (from ip_vs_core.c)
>> */
>> @@ -1604,7 +1616,7 @@ static inline void ip_vs_est_stopped_recalc(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
>> /* Stop tasks while cpulist is empty or if disabled with flag */
>> ipvs->est_stopped = !sysctl_run_estimation(ipvs) ||
>> (ipvs->est_cpulist_valid &&
>> - cpumask_empty(sysctl_est_cpulist(ipvs)));
>> + sysctl_est_cpulist_empty(ipvs));
>> #endif
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1620,7 +1632,7 @@ static inline bool ip_vs_est_stopped(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
>> static inline int ip_vs_est_max_threads(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
>> {
>> unsigned int limit = IPVS_EST_CPU_KTHREADS *
>> - cpumask_weight(sysctl_est_cpulist(ipvs));
>> + sysctl_est_cpulist_weight(ipvs);
>>
>> return max(1U, limit);
>> }
>> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
>> index 35642de2a0fe..f38a2e2a9dc5 100644
>> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
>> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
>> @@ -1973,11 +1973,14 @@ static int ipvs_proc_est_cpumask_get(const struct ctl_table *table,
>>
>> mutex_lock(&ipvs->est_mutex);
>>
>> - if (ipvs->est_cpulist_valid)
>> - mask = *valp;
>> - else
>> - mask = (struct cpumask *)housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_KTHREAD);
>> - ret = scnprintf(buffer, size, "%*pbl\n", cpumask_pr_args(mask));
>> + /* HK_TYPE_KTHREAD cpumask needs RCU protection */
> Can we switch IPVS to use HK_TYPE_DOMAIN? The initial
> intention was to follow the code in kthread.c. Then you can
> reconsider if HK_TYPE_KTHREAD should be alias to HK_TYPE_DOMAIN,
> may be not if there are no other users...
Yes, I can certainly switch to use HK_TYPE_DOMAIN instead. The reason I
keep HK_TYPE_KTHREAD is that it may not be obvious to others that
kthread is now following the HK_TYPE_DOMAIN cpumask,
keeping HK_TYPE_KTHREAD but making it an alias can make that clear.
>> + scoped_guard(rcu) {
>> + if (ipvs->est_cpulist_valid)
>> + mask = *valp;
>> + else
>> + mask = (struct cpumask *)housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_KTHREAD);
>> + ret = scnprintf(buffer, size, "%*pbl\n", cpumask_pr_args(mask));
>> + }
>>
>> mutex_unlock(&ipvs->est_mutex);
>>
>> --
>> 2.53.0
> Regards
>
> --
> Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-31 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-24 15:18 [PATCH 0/2] ipvs: Fix incorrect use of HK_TYPE_KTHREAD housekeeping cpumask Waiman Long
2026-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/isolation: Make HK_TYPE_KTHREAD an alias of HK_TYPE_DOMAIN Waiman Long
2026-03-24 18:59 ` David Dull
2026-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] ipvs: Guard access of HK_TYPE_KTHREAD cpumask with RCU Waiman Long
2026-03-26 8:32 ` Julian Anastasov
2026-03-31 14:23 ` Waiman Long [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b2fea411-de12-4e1a-bfc5-fdc14b2e29d5@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=sheviks@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox