From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Add other KSZ switch support so that patch check does not complain Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 14:18:02 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1507322009-15142-1-git-send-email-Tristram.Ha@microchip.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: muvarov@gmail.com, nathan.leigh.conrad@gmail.com, vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Tristram.Ha@microchip.com, Andrew Lunn , Pavel Machek , Ruediger Schmitt Return-path: Received: from mail-qt0-f193.google.com ([209.85.216.193]:46910 "EHLO mail-qt0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752034AbdJKVSG (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2017 17:18:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1507322009-15142-1-git-send-email-Tristram.Ha@microchip.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/06/2017 01:33 PM, Tristram.Ha@microchip.com wrote: > From: Tristram Ha > > Add other KSZ switch support so that patch check does not complain. You are not doing this just so checkpatch.pl stops complaining, what you are doing here is to properly document the possible models supported by this binding document. Please also use a proper subject for this patch: dt-bindings: dsa: Document additional Micrel KSZ family switches or something along those lines. With that: Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli -- Florian