From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, edumazet@google.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] inetpeer: fix uninit-value in inet_getpeer
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 08:08:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b4d9778e-a486-a59b-7ed2-97509722b70e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180409.105839.445341256424332032.davem@davemloft.net>
On 04/09/2018 07:58 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 06:43:27 -0700
>
>> syzbot/KMSAN reported that p->dtime was read while it was
>> not yet initialized in :
>>
>> delta = (__u32)jiffies - p->dtime;
>> if (delta < ttl || !refcount_dec_if_one(&p->refcnt))
>> gc_stack[i] = NULL;
>>
>> This is a false positive, because the inetpeer wont be erased
>> from rb-tree if the refcount_dec_if_one(&p->refcnt) does not
>> succeed. And this wont happen before first inet_putpeer() call
>> for this inetpeer has been done, and ->dtime field is written
>> exactly before the refcount_dec_and_test(&p->refcnt).
>>
>> The KMSAN report was :
> ...
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>> Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
>
> Applied, but it looks like we are just adding assignments simply
> to placate these reports when the tools and facilities cannot
> see through the logic properly.
>
To be fair, this is because the check on ->dtime should be done a second time after
the refcount_dec_if_one(&p->refcnt)
It is a tiny race, and we do not really care given nature of inetpeer cache, best effort,
and DDOS candidate anyway.
If we purge one entry too soon, this is not a big deal.
I believe tool is fine.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-09 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-09 13:43 [PATCH net] inetpeer: fix uninit-value in inet_getpeer Eric Dumazet
2018-04-09 14:58 ` David Miller
2018-04-09 15:08 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b4d9778e-a486-a59b-7ed2-97509722b70e@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox