From: Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>
To: Hidayath Khan <hidayath@linux.ibm.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, alibuda@linux.alibaba.com,
dust.li@linux.alibaba.com, sidraya@linux.ibm.com,
wenjia@linux.ibm.com, mjambigi@linux.ibm.com
Cc: tonylu@linux.alibaba.com, guwen@linux.alibaba.com,
horms@kernel.org, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
agordeev@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
svens@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, gbayer@linux.ibm.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] dibs: fix use-after-free of dmb_node in loopback attach/detach/unregister
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 10:50:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b4dccacb-e129-47eb-9b17-aaac13d9fa9a@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260727093530.968834-1-hidayath@linux.ibm.com>
On 27.07.26 11:35, Hidayath Khan wrote:
> dibs_lo_attach_dmb(), dibs_lo_detach_dmb() and dibs_lo_unregister_dmb()
> look up the dmb_node under dmb_ht_lock, drop the lock and only then
> operate on the node's refcount. Nothing keeps the node alive across
> that window: __dibs_lo_unregister_dmb() removes the node from the hash
> table under the write lock and immediately frees it.
>
> A concurrent final put can therefore free the node between the lookup
> and the refcount operation:
>
> CPU0 (attach) CPU1 (owner unregisters)
>
[...]
>
> Note: commit cc21191b584c ("dibs: Move data path to dibs layer") moved
> the code to its current location; the race was introduced earlier by
> commit c3a910f2380f ("net/smc: implement DMB-merged operations of
> loopback-ism").
>
> Tested SMC-D via ISM and dibs loopback.
>
> Fixes: c3a910f2380f ("net/smc: implement DMB-merged operations of loopback-ism")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Hidayath Khan <hidayath@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>
For the records:
Deeper analysis showed that there is no path in the SMC code that can lead to such
a race. SMC currently is the only user of dibs_loopback and was the only user
of loopback-ism.
So the stable tag was not really necessary. Sorry for the noise.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-06 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-27 9:35 [PATCH net] dibs: fix use-after-free of dmb_node in loopback attach/detach/unregister Hidayath Khan
2026-07-29 12:25 ` Alexandra Winter
2026-07-29 12:50 ` Hidayathulla Khan I
2026-07-30 0:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-08-06 8:50 ` Alexandra Winter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b4dccacb-e129-47eb-9b17-aaac13d9fa9a@linux.ibm.com \
--to=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hidayath@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjambigi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sidraya@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox