From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Yizhou Zhao <zhaoyz24@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>,
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>,
Krishna Kumar <krikku@gmail.com>,
Yuxiang Yang <yangyx22@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>,
Xuewei Feng <fengxw06@126.com>, Qi Li <qli01@tsinghua.edu.cn>,
Ke Xu <xuke@tsinghua.edu.cn>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] net: core: dev: add reprocess depth limit for another_round in __netif_receive_skb_core
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 13:45:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b4ddcc50-ba34-4788-8931-40f31ec43986@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260512022127.7818-1-zhaoyz24@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
On 5/12/26 4:21 AM, Yizhou Zhao wrote:
> In __netif_receive_skb_core(), the another_round label can be reached
> via a TC ingress redirect (bpf_redirect_peer returning -EAGAIN).
>
> Across network namespaces, two BPF programs on peer devices can redirect
> packets back and forth indefinitely, creating an unbounded loop that
> monopolizes a CPU core in softirq context. This leads to RCU stalls,
> soft lockups, and system-wide denial of service.
>
> We reproduced it by creating a pair of TC BPF programs across two
> network namespaces that redirect packets to each other, and the RCU
> subsystem detects a stall:
>
> ```
> [ 24.835219] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
> [ 24.835837] rcu: (detected by 0, t=21002 jiffies, g=-627, q=2 ncpus=1)
> [ 24.835959] rcu: All QSes seen, last rcu_preempt kthread activity 21002 (4294691810-4294670808), jiffies_till_next_fqs=3, root ->qsmask 0x0
> [ 24.836239] rcu: rcu_preempt kthread starved for 21002 jiffies! g-627 f0x2 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x0 ->cpu=0
> [ 24.836362] rcu: Unless rcu_preempt kthread gets sufficient CPU time, OOM is now expected behavior.
> [ 24.836460] rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump:
> [ 24.836601] task:rcu_preempt state:R running task stack:15448 pid:15 tgid:15 ppid:2 task_flags:0x208040 flags:0x00080000
> [ 24.837139] Call Trace:
> [ 24.837568] <TASK>
> [ 24.838008] __schedule+0x4ed/0xea0
> [ 24.838934] schedule+0x22/0xd0
> [ 24.839023] schedule_timeout+0x81/0x100
> [ 24.839095] ? __pfx_process_timeout+0x10/0x10
> [ 24.839165] rcu_gp_fqs_loop+0x11b/0x650
> [ 24.839226] ? __pfx_rcu_gp_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [ 24.839282] rcu_gp_kthread+0x17e/0x210
> [ 24.839333] ? __pfx_rcu_gp_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [ 24.839383] kthread+0xdd/0x110
> [ 24.839433] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [ 24.839481] ret_from_fork+0x1aa/0x260
> [ 24.839538] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [ 24.839585] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
> [ 24.839686] </TASK>
> ......
> ```
>
> Fix this by adding a depth counter when it is about to go to another_round
> label. When the counter exceeds XMIT_RECURSION_LIMIT (8), the packet is
> dropped. This follows the same pattern as dev_xmit_recursion() which
> protects the TX redirect path with the same limit.
>
> Reuse SKB_DROP_REASON_TC_RECLASSIFY_LOOP for observability.
>
> Fixes: 9aa1206e8f48 ("bpf: Add redirect_peer helper")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Yizhou Zhao <zhaoyz24@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
> Reported-by: Yuxiang Yang <yangyx22@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
> Reported-by: Xuewei Feng <fengxw06@126.com>
> Reported-by: Qi Li <qli01@tsinghua.edu.cn>
> Reported-by: Ke Xu <xuke@tsinghua.edu.cn>
> Assisted-by: GLM:GLM-5.1
> Signed-off-by: Yizhou Zhao <zhaoyz24@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Move the check just after `another` is set to true to avoid affecting the fast path
> - Reuse SKB_DROP_REASON_TC_RECLASSIFY_LOOP to avoid adding new drop reason
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260511063005.38134-1-zhaoyz24@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn/
> ---
> net/core/dev.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 831129f2a..bb9ae92f0 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -5958,6 +5958,7 @@ static int __netif_receive_skb_core(struct sk_buff **pskb, bool pfmemalloc,
> struct net_device *orig_dev;
> bool deliver_exact = false;
> int ret = NET_RX_DROP;
> + int redirect_depth = 0;
As reported by sashiko, the above will cause an unused variable warning,
should be protected by #ifdef CONFIG_NET_INGRESS compiler guard.
Also please respect the reverse christmas tree order above.
/P
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-14 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-12 2:21 [PATCH v2 net] net: core: dev: add reprocess depth limit for another_round in __netif_receive_skb_core Yizhou Zhao
2026-05-14 11:45 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2026-05-14 22:11 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b4ddcc50-ba34-4788-8931-40f31ec43986@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fengxw06@126.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=krikku@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qli01@tsinghua.edu.cn \
--cc=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xuke@tsinghua.edu.cn \
--cc=yangyx22@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn \
--cc=zhaoyz24@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox