From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
<magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next 2/3] ice: avoid unnecessary devm_ usage
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:45:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b50229cb-e3b0-44f8-9725-6592b74dfebf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240222145025.722515-3-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
On 2/22/24 15:50, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> 1. pcaps are free'd right after AQ routines are done, no need for
> devm_'s
> 2. a test frame for loopback test in ethtool -t is destroyed at the end
> of the test so we don't need devm_ here either.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_common.c | 23 +++++++++-----------
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
nice, thank you!
BTW, we are committed to using Scope Based Resource Management [1] even
in the OOT driver, so you could consider that for future IWL submissions
:)
[1] https://lwn.net/Articles/934679/
I'm also happy with this as-is too, so:
Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-23 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-22 14:50 [PATCH iwl-next 0/3] intel: misc improvements Maciej Fijalkowski
2024-02-22 14:50 ` [PATCH iwl-next 1/3] ice: do not disable Tx queues twice in ice_down() Maciej Fijalkowski
2024-02-22 14:50 ` [PATCH iwl-next 2/3] ice: avoid unnecessary devm_ usage Maciej Fijalkowski
2024-02-23 7:45 ` Przemek Kitszel [this message]
2024-02-23 15:03 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2024-02-23 9:35 ` kernel test robot
2024-02-22 14:50 ` [PATCH iwl-next 3/3] ixgbe: pull out stats update to common routines Maciej Fijalkowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b50229cb-e3b0-44f8-9725-6592b74dfebf@intel.com \
--to=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).