From: "Lifshits, Vitaly" <vitaly.lifshits@intel.com>
To: Rui Salvaterra <rsalvaterra@gmail.com>,
<anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>, <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Cc: <edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next] igc: demote register and ring dumps to debug
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 19:59:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b50bf0ca-abad-454d-8e47-e60312609383@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250707092531.365663-1-rsalvaterra@gmail.com>
On 7/7/2025 12:17 PM, Rui Salvaterra wrote:
> This is debug information, upon which the user is not expected to act. Output as
> such. This avoids polluting the dmesg with full register dumps at every link
> down.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rui Salvaterra <rsalvaterra@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> This file hasn't been touched in over four years, it's probably from a time when
> the driver was under heavy development (started in 2018). Nevertheless, the
> status quo is positively annoying. :)
>
Hi Rui,
Thanks for this patch.
However, I don't completely agree with you.
I think that the main idea here was to have enough data to pass for the
developers in a case where any issue happens without enabling debug
mode. Especially, for those issues that reproduce rarely.
I compared this function to the corresponding functions in ixgbe and igb
and I see that they are implemented similarly.
Therefore, in my opinion, I think that it is better to leave the prints
as they are. Or at least, to push similar changes to the other drivers
as well.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-14 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-07 9:17 [PATCH iwl-next] igc: demote register and ring dumps to debug Rui Salvaterra
2025-07-14 16:31 ` Simon Horman
2025-07-14 16:59 ` Lifshits, Vitaly [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b50bf0ca-abad-454d-8e47-e60312609383@intel.com \
--to=vitaly.lifshits@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=rsalvaterra@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox