From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: Re: [PATCH] WiMAX-i2400m: Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "kfree_skb" Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 22:11:20 +0200 Message-ID: References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <530A086E.8010901@users.sourceforge.net> <530A72AA.3000601@users.sourceforge.net> <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net> <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <5649AE81.6070809@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall To: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez , linux-wimax@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5649AE81.6070809@users.sourceforge.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:17:55 +0100 > > The kfree_skb() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then > returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed. > > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring > --- > drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/control.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/control.c b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/control.c > index 4c41790..4de22b7 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/control.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/control.c > @@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ void i2400m_msg_to_dev_cancel_wait(struct i2400m *i2400m, int code) > > spin_lock_irqsave(&i2400m->rx_lock, flags); > ack_skb = i2400m->ack_skb; > - if (ack_skb && !IS_ERR(ack_skb)) > + if (!IS_ERR(ack_skb)) > kfree_skb(ack_skb); > i2400m->ack_skb = ERR_PTR(code); > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i2400m->rx_lock, flags); > How do you think about to integrate this update suggestion into another source code repository? Regards, Markus