From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/2] net: phy: refuse a second attach before touching the PHY
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 13:51:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b5df1546-4208-4dff-b494-6db516188795@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261013151200.2473464-2-f@lex.la>
On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 06:11:59PM +0300, Aleksei Sviridkin wrote:
> phy_attach_direct() tests phydev->attached_dev only after it has taken
> the driver module and, for a PHY with no driver, bound the generic one,
> and then leaves through the error path that calls
> phy_detach_internal(). That call works on the PHY's current attachment,
> so a second attach of a PHY in use tears down the first consumer: it
> clears that netdev's phydev pointer and the PHY's attached_dev, removes
> the sysfs links and suspends the PHY, while the first consumer goes on
> using it. A PHY on the generic driver never reaches the test: the
> attach runs its probe again and, when the bind fails, clears d->driver
> under the first consumer.
>
> Found in review of a change that makes phy_detach() put only the
> module the attach recorded: with it, this path leaves the first
> consumer's reference pinned. On a Keenetic KN-1012, a test module
> attaching a second netdev to the EN8811H that the lan4 DSA port holds
> got -EBUSY and left lan4 with no PHY; with this change lan4 kept it.
>
> Test whether the PHY is attached before the driver module is taken or
> the generic driver bound, and refuse from there. A PHY attached without
> a netdev, as DSA does for its CPU and link ports, has no attached_dev,
> so test phy_link_change, which every attach sets and every detach
> clears. A second attach of such a PHY used to succeed and share it;
> with that change it would also leak a module reference.
>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-13 15:11 [PATCH net-next v6 0/2] net: phy: fix a second attach of an attached PHY and the module put on detach Aleksei Sviridkin
2026-10-13 15:11 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/2] net: phy: refuse a second attach before touching the PHY Aleksei Sviridkin
2026-10-14 11:51 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2026-10-13 15:12 ` [PATCH net-next v6 2/2] net: phy: put the driver module the attach took Aleksei Sviridkin
2026-10-17 1:50 ` [PATCH net-next v6 0/2] net: phy: fix a second attach of an attached PHY and the module put on detach patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b5df1546-4208-4dff-b494-6db516188795@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=f@lex.la \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
--cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox