From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
To: Danny Gonzalez <digonzal@google.com>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Decotigny <decot@google.com>,
"Anjali Singhai" <anjali.singhai@intel.com>,
Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>,
Brian Vazquez <brianvv@google.com>, Li Li <boolli@google.com>,
<emil.s.tantilov@intel.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net] idpf: decrease statistics refresh interval
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 17:57:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b601d0d4-d472-450d-a966-e18c9642a433@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611002437.1671401-1-digonzal@google.com>
From: Danny Gonzalez <digonzal@google.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:24:37 +0000
> The default 10s statistics refresh interval is too slow for real-time
> monitoring and causes network selftests (e.g., uso.py) to fail when
> verifying traffic immediately after transmission.
>
> A 10s delay also causes aliasing in telemetry tools polling at shorter
> intervals (e.g., 5s), leading to inaccurate rate calculations on
> high-throughput NICs.
>
> Decrease the refresh interval to 250ms to ensure fresh stats and fix
> test failures.
Have you tried a bit more conservate value like 1s? Wouldn't it be
enough for tests to pass?
250 ms is also okay, just curious.
>
> Tested: drivers/net/hw:uso.py now passes
> Fixes: a251eee62133 ("idpf: add SRIOV support and other ndo_ops")
> Signed-off-by: Danny Gonzalez <digonzal@google.com>
Thanks,
Olek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-11 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-11 0:24 [PATCH iwl-net] idpf: decrease statistics refresh interval Danny Gonzalez
2026-06-11 15:10 ` Brian Vazquez
2026-06-11 15:57 ` Alexander Lobakin [this message]
2026-06-11 18:26 ` Danny Gonzalez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b601d0d4-d472-450d-a966-e18c9642a433@intel.com \
--to=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=anjali.singhai@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=boolli@google.com \
--cc=brianvv@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=decot@google.com \
--cc=digonzal@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=emil.s.tantilov@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox