From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Chua Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: per-cpu spin-lock with recursion (v0.8) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:15:44 +0800 Message-ID: References: <20090415170111.6e1ca264@nehalam> <49E72E83.50702@trash.net> <20090416.153354.170676392.davem@davemloft.net> <20090416234955.GL6924@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090416165233.5d8bbfb5@nehalam> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, David Miller , kaber@trash.net, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, dada1@cosmosbay.com, paulus@samba.org, mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, jengelh@medozas.de, r000n@r000n.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.173]:59669 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751966AbZDQAPp (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:15:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090416165233.5d8bbfb5@nehalam> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > This version of x_tables (ip/ip6/arp) locking uses a per-cpu > recursive lock that can be nested. It is sort of like existing kernel_lock, > rwlock_t and even old 2.4 brlock. Tested and working. As fast as before. Thanks, Jeff.