From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: phy: improve PM handling of PHY/MDIO
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2018 22:33:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b8f7b42e-791a-5997-d5eb-16f649738421@gmail.com> (raw)
Current implementation of MDIO bus PM ops doesn't actually implement
bus-specific PM ops but just calls PM ops defined on a device level
what doesn't seem to be fully in line with the core PM model.
When looking e.g. at __device_suspend() the PM core looks for PM ops
of a device in a specific order:
1. device PM domain
2. device type
3. device class
4. device bus
I think it has good reason that there's no PM ops on device level.
The situation can be improved by modeling PHY's as device type of
a MDIO device. If for some other type of MDIO device PM ops are
needed, it could be modeled as struct device_type as well.
Heiner Kallweit (2):
net: phy: add struct device_type representation of a PHY
net: phy: remove PM ops from MDIO bus
drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c | 48 ------------------
drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
include/linux/mdio.h | 1 -
3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2018-06-02 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-02 20:33 Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2018-06-02 20:36 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: phy: add struct device_type representation of a PHY Heiner Kallweit
2018-06-02 20:37 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phy: remove PM ops from MDIO bus Heiner Kallweit
2018-06-04 19:41 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: phy: improve PM handling of PHY/MDIO David Miller
2018-06-04 21:48 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-06-04 22:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2018-06-05 6:08 ` Heiner Kallweit
2018-06-05 12:50 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b8f7b42e-791a-5997-d5eb-16f649738421@gmail.com \
--to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).