From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
To: Doruk Tan Ozturk <doruk@0sec.ai>,
saeedm@nvidia.com, leon@kernel.org, tariqt@nvidia.com,
mbloch@nvidia.com, sd@queasysnail.net, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: horms@kernel.org, borisp@nvidia.com, raeds@nvidia.com,
ehakim@nvidia.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4] net/mlx5e: macsec: fix use-after-free of metadata_dst on RX SC delete
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 14:04:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b979e01b-fe90-477c-ae3f-cbe1d29506ee@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260627223059.29917-1-doruk@0sec.ai>
On 28/06/2026 1:30, Doruk Tan Ozturk wrote:
> When an offloaded MACsec RX SC is deleted, macsec_del_rxsc_ctx() freed
> the per-SC metadata_dst with metadata_dst_free(), which kfree()s the
> object unconditionally and ignores the dst reference count. The RX
> datapath in mlx5e_macsec_offload_handle_rx_skb() looks up the SC under
> rcu_read_lock() via xa_load(), takes a reference with dst_hold() and
> attaches the dst to the skb with skb_dst_set(). A reader that already
> obtained the rx_sc pointer can race with the delete path and operate on
> freed memory.
>
> Fix the owner side by dropping the reference with dst_release() instead
> of freeing unconditionally, and convert the RX datapath to
> dst_hold_safe() so a reader racing the SC delete cannot attach a dst
> whose last reference was just dropped; only attach it when a reference
> was actually taken.
>
> mlx5e_macsec_add_rxsc() also published sc_xarray_element via xa_alloc()
> before rx_sc->md_dst was allocated and initialised, so a datapath reader
> that looked the SC up by fs_id could observe rx_sc with md_dst still
> NULL or, on weakly-ordered architectures, a non-NULL md_dst pointer
> whose contents were not yet visible. NULL-check the xa_load() result and
> md_dst on the datapath, and reorder add_rxsc() so the xa_alloc() publish
> happens only after md_dst is fully initialised; the xarray RCU publish
> then pairs with the rcu_read_lock()/xa_load() in the datapath.
>
> Note: macsec_del_rxsc_ctx() also kfree()s rx_sc->sc_xarray_element
> without an RCU grace period while the same datapath reads it under
> rcu_read_lock(); that is a separate pre-existing issue left to a
> follow-up patch.
>
> Found by 0sec automated security-research tooling (https://0sec.ai).
>
> Fixes: b7c9400cbc48 ("net/mlx5e: Implement MACsec Rx data path using MACsec skb_metadata_dst")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Doruk Tan Ozturk <doruk@0sec.ai>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-29 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-27 22:30 [PATCH net v4] net/mlx5e: macsec: fix use-after-free of metadata_dst on RX SC delete Doruk Tan Ozturk
2026-06-29 11:04 ` Tariq Toukan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b979e01b-fe90-477c-ae3f-cbe1d29506ee@nvidia.com \
--to=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=borisp@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=doruk@0sec.ai \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ehakim@nvidia.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=raeds@nvidia.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox