From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 2/2] net: airoha: Add missing bits in airoha_qdma_cleanup_tx_queue()
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 19:32:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9d1e3b6-ad3c-4bdc-98aa-2e00a2937585@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aeewoVjN7EHLZTW_@lore-desk>
On 4/21/26 7:15 PM, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
>> On 4/17/26 8:36 AM, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
>>> @@ -1055,8 +1058,33 @@ static void airoha_qdma_cleanup_tx_queue(struct airoha_queue *q)
>>> e->dma_addr = 0;
>>> e->skb = NULL;
>>> list_add_tail(&e->list, &q->tx_list);
>>> +
>>> + /* Reset DMA descriptor */
>>> + WRITE_ONCE(desc->ctrl, 0);
>>> + WRITE_ONCE(desc->addr, 0);
>>> + WRITE_ONCE(desc->data, 0);
>>> + WRITE_ONCE(desc->msg0, 0);
>>> + WRITE_ONCE(desc->msg1, 0);
>>> + WRITE_ONCE(desc->msg2, 0);
>>
>> Sashiko has some complains on this patch that look legit to me.
>>
>> Also the pre-existing issues mentioned WRT patch 1/2 makes such patch
>> IMHO almost ineffective, I think you should address them in the same series.
>>
>> Note that you should have commented on sashiko review on the ML, it
>> would have saved a significant amount of time on us.
>
> Since this series is marked as 'Changes Requested', it is not clear to me what
> next steps are. I guess we have two possible approach here:
>
> 1) - Post patch 1/2 ("net: airoha: Move ndesc initialization at
> end of airoha_qdma_init_tx()") with the series available upstream
> (not merged yet) in [0] where I am fixing similar issues for
> airoha_qdma_init_rx_queue() and airoha_qdma_tx_irq_init().
> - Post patch 2/2 ("net: airoha: Add missing bits in
> airoha_qdma_cleanup_tx_queue()") with a fix for airoha_ndo_stop() waiting
> for TX/RX DMA engine to complete before running
> airoha_qdma_cleanup_tx_queue().
>
> 2) - Since all the issues rised by Sashiko are not strictly related to this
> series and they are already fixed in pending patches, just apply the fixes
> separately without the needs to repost this series.
Given the current flood on the ML I think option 2 could be the better.
Note that the tree is currently in Jakub's hands and he can very legitly
disagree.
/P
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-21 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-17 6:36 [PATCH net v4 0/2] net: airoha: Fix airoha_qdma_cleanup_tx_queue() processing Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-04-17 6:36 ` [PATCH net v4 1/2] net: airoha: Move ndesc initialization at end of airoha_qdma_init_tx() Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-04-17 6:36 ` [PATCH net v4 2/2] net: airoha: Add missing bits in airoha_qdma_cleanup_tx_queue() Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-04-21 11:20 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-04-21 11:42 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-04-21 17:15 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-04-21 17:32 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2026-04-20 13:56 ` [PATCH net v4 0/2] net: airoha: Fix airoha_qdma_cleanup_tx_queue() processing Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b9d1e3b6-ad3c-4bdc-98aa-2e00a2937585@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox