From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: Nick Child <nnac123@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Haren Myneni <haren@linux.ibm.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Rick Lindsley <ricklind@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ibmvnic: Use -EBUSY in __ibmvnic_reset()
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:41:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba5e5ccf-59fa-4c7f-b649-97c19b2008a0@moroto.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7e3f43a3-98e0-40ed-8820-2f1eef8742ba@linux.ibm.com>
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 09:55:57AM -0500, Nick Child wrote:
> > You're right that it doesn't affect the behavior of the driver except
> > for the debug output when we do:
> >
> > netdev_dbg(adapter->netdev, "Reset failed, rc=%d\n", rc);
> >
> > But the - was left off uninitentionally so I think we should apply it.
> >
> > I have been trying to look for similar bugs where the - is left off.
> > It's a bit challenging because there places where we use positive
> > error codes deliberately. But in this case a static checker could
> > easily detect the bug with a low false positive ratio by saying, "We're
> > mixing normal negative error codes with positive EBUSY".
> >
> > regards,
> > dan carpenter
>
> Hello, small clarification, this patch will not effect the debug print
> statement due to the break statement immediately following:
> while () {
> if () {
> rc = -EBUSY;
> break;
> }
> netdev_dbg(adapter->netdev, "Reset failed, rc=%d\n", rc);
> }
> Though this return code can be passed to adapter->reset_done_rc, which is
> only treated as a boolean.
>
> So, the point of the patch not doing any behavioral differences is still
> true.
Ah yes. You're right.
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-23 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-19 14:08 [PATCH] ibmvnic: Use -EBUSY in __ibmvnic_reset() Markus Elfring
2024-04-23 10:54 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-04-23 11:55 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-04-23 14:55 ` Nick Child
2024-04-23 15:41 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2024-04-25 2:32 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ba5e5ccf-59fa-4c7f-b649-97c19b2008a0@moroto.mountain \
--to=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haren@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nnac123@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=ricklind@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox