From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
To: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: "D H, Siddaraju" <siddaraju.dh@intel.com>,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Chintalapalle, Balaji" <balaji.chintalapalle@intel.com>,
"Das, Shubham" <shubham.das@intel.com>,
"Srinivasan, Vijay" <vijay.srinivasan@intel.com>,
"Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>,
"Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
"Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
"singhai.anjali55@gmail.com" <singhai.anjali55@gmail.com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jbrandeburg@cloudflare.com>
Subject: Re: Ethtool is missing C2C link modes
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2026 10:42:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb7bb5c6-5643-4e5b-b26b-9363127bb2d8@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260711073128.7f94e0ac@pumpkin>
Hi,
On 7/11/26 08:31, David Laight wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jul 2026 00:54:00 +0200
> Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 09:45:43PM +0000, D H, Siddaraju wrote:
>>> Hello Linux Ethernet team, Maxime, Andrew & Michal,
>>>
>>> The IEEE AUI chip-to-chip (C2C) is the accepted standard for connecting
>>> chips that handle subfunctions within the OSI physical layer. Just to
>>> pick, the C2C is widely used when connecting Ethernet SoCs with retimers
>>> and PCS SerDes terminated external-phys to offload PHY sublayer functions.
>>
>> It cannot be that widely used if Linux does not support it yet :-)
>
> It also seems like something that is fixed for a physical board.
> So while a common MAC driver would need to be told how to configure
> its output, the user wouldn't be changing the value so it would
> be more of a DT parameter than an ethtool one.
>
> ...
>> Also, an architecture question...
>>
>> It sounds like you use this between the MAC and the PCS. The PCS can
>> then be connected to a PHY, and the PHY then has a line side. (I'm
>> being a bit loose with the terms here, i should probably be saying
>> PMA, PMD etc.)
>>
>> Should ethtool be saying:
>>
>> Settings for eth0:
>> Supported ports: [ TP MII ]
>> Supported link modes: 25000baseC2C
>>
>> or should it be reporting:
>>
>> Settings for eth0:
>> Supported ports: [ TP MII ]
>> Supported link modes: 25000baseSR
>>
>> I _think_ ethtool reports the media, not some intermediary format.
>
> You'd want to use ethtool to set the final link parameters of the
> external phy?
> So I think you's still want to be able to select (say) 100MHDX
> for a TP link.
>
> Remember the history.
> The parameter was originally used to select between the the AUI, COAX and TP
> connectors on a 10M ethernet card.
> Then the internal TP gained extra speeds.
> We then get MII for external 10M and 100M PHY, later RGMII for external Ge PHY.
> But you rarely get boards (not MAC chips) that have a choice of interfaces
> any more.
Note that there's ongoing work[1] to better support nics with multiple connectors,
which also includes reporting what the 'media-side' of a MAC / PHY can do :
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260701110427.143945-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com/#t
Taking the example of a combo-port (SFP + RJ45), it would look like that :
ethtool --show-ports eth1
Port for eth1:
Port id: 1
Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Full
10000baseT/Full
2500baseT/Full
5000baseT/Full
Port type: mdi
Port for eth1:
Port id: 2
Supported MII interfaces : 10gbase-r
Port type: sfp
or even
# ethtool --show-ports eth3
Port for eth3:
Port id: 1
Supported MII interfaces : sgmii, 1000base-x, 2500base-x
Port type: sfp
Now, with this infrastucture also comes the ability to list the media-side
interfaces that are not MDI but rather MII.
The main goal is combo-port support, but also media-converters, e.g. things
like :
MAC ------ PHY ------- <something>
rgmii sgmii
(for now, the ongoing series focus on supporting this through SFP, but extending
that to other link types is something I'd like to achieve)
As Andrew says, when you use "ethtool ethX", the list you get is the media-side
modes that you can use at the connector, so it's an aggregated list of the MDI
that are usable based on the MAC, PCS, PHY you're using (MAC and PCS would limit
speed/encoding, PHY defines the actual MDI modes)
For the C2C modes, it's not clear to me if these are MDI modes, i.e:
ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_25000baseC2C
Or a phy_interface_t, i.e:
PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_25GAUI
We already have XAUI and RXAUI as phy_interface_t as of today, so it looks like
we don't want an ethool linkmode for that but rather a phy_interface_t
Maxime
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-11 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 21:45 Ethtool is missing C2C link modes D H, Siddaraju
2026-07-10 22:54 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-07-11 6:31 ` David Laight
2026-07-11 8:42 ` Maxime Chevallier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bb7bb5c6-5643-4e5b-b26b-9363127bb2d8@bootlin.com \
--to=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=balaji.chintalapalle@intel.com \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jbrandeburg@cloudflare.com \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shubham.das@intel.com \
--cc=siddaraju.dh@intel.com \
--cc=singhai.anjali55@gmail.com \
--cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
--cc=vijay.srinivasan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox