From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/10] net: dsa: Support for pdata in dsa2 Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 09:40:24 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20170114214713.28109-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <20170115110831.GH26374@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Gregory Clement , Russell King , Vivien Didelot , "David S. Miller" , "moderated list:ARM SUB-ARCHITECTURES" , open list To: Greg KH Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170115110831.GH26374@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 01/15/2017 03:08 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 01:47:03PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This is not exactly new, and was sent before, although back then, I did not >> have an user of the pre-declared MDIO board information, but now we do. Note >> that I have additional changes queued up to have b53 register platform data for >> MIPS bcm47xx and bcm63xx. >> >> Yes I know that we should have the Orion platforms eventually be converted to >> Device Tree, but until that happens, I don't want any remaining users of the >> old "dsa" platform device (hence the previous DTS submissions for ARM/mvebu) >> and, there will be platforms out there that most likely won't never see DT >> coming their way (BCM47xx is almost 100% sure, BCM63xx maybe not in a distant >> future). >> >> We would probably want the whole series to be merged via David Miller's tree >> to simplify things. >> >> Greg, can you Ack/Nack patch 5 since it touched the core LDD? > > I've NAKed them for now, you need to describe what you are trying to do > here, as it doesn't make any sense to me at the moment. For one, this is moving *existing* code from net/dsa/dsa.c part into the device core for device_find_class() and part into the network device core for dev_to_net_device(). Patch 8 is where this actually gets used. See my individual replies for more details. Even though the existing code is there in net/dsa/dsa.c, at this point, and for the sake of getting these patches merged via David, I can probably just keep it where it is (like what patch series v1 did) and just namespace it with dsa_. Later on, if this is deemed valuable to other parts of the kernel, I can try to relocate it to the device core, does that sound acceptable? -- Florian