netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Loftus, Ciara" <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
	"bjorn@kernel.org" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
	"magnus.karlsson@gmail.com" <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 bpf 3/3] libbpf: ignore return values of setsockopt for XDP rings.
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 08:41:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc1d9e861d27499da5f5a84bc6d22177@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210327022729.cgizt5xnhkerbrmy@ast-mbp>

> 
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 02:29:46PM +0000, Ciara Loftus wrote:
> > During xsk_socket__create the XDP_RX_RING and XDP_TX_RING
> setsockopts
> > are called to create the rx and tx rings for the AF_XDP socket. If the ring
> > has already been set up, the setsockopt will return an error. However,
> > in the event of a failure during xsk_socket__create(_shared) after the
> > rings have been set up, the user may wish to retry the socket creation
> > using these pre-existing rings. In this case we can ignore the error
> > returned by the setsockopts. If there is a true error, the subsequent
> > call to mmap() will catch it.
> >
> > Fixes: 1cad07884239 ("libbpf: add support for using AF_XDP sockets")
> >
> > Acked-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++------------------
> >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c b/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
> > index d4991ddff05a..cfc4abf505c3 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
> > @@ -900,24 +900,22 @@ int xsk_socket__create_shared(struct xsk_socket
> **xsk_ptr,
> >  	}
> >  	xsk->ctx = ctx;
> >
> > -	if (rx) {
> > -		err = setsockopt(xsk->fd, SOL_XDP, XDP_RX_RING,
> > -				 &xsk->config.rx_size,
> > -				 sizeof(xsk->config.rx_size));
> > -		if (err) {
> > -			err = -errno;
> > -			goto out_put_ctx;
> > -		}
> > -	}
> > -	if (tx) {
> > -		err = setsockopt(xsk->fd, SOL_XDP, XDP_TX_RING,
> > -				 &xsk->config.tx_size,
> > -				 sizeof(xsk->config.tx_size));
> > -		if (err) {
> > -			err = -errno;
> > -			goto out_put_ctx;
> > -		}
> > -	}
> > +	/* The return values of these setsockopt calls are intentionally not
> checked.
> > +	 * If the ring has already been set up setsockopt will return an error.
> However,
> > +	 * this scenario is acceptable as the user may be retrying the socket
> creation
> > +	 * with rings which were set up in a previous but ultimately
> unsuccessful call
> > +	 * to xsk_socket__create(_shared). The call later to mmap() will fail if
> there
> > +	 * is a real issue and we handle that return value appropriately there.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (rx)
> > +		setsockopt(xsk->fd, SOL_XDP, XDP_RX_RING,
> > +			   &xsk->config.rx_size,
> > +			   sizeof(xsk->config.rx_size));
> > +
> > +	if (tx)
> > +		setsockopt(xsk->fd, SOL_XDP, XDP_TX_RING,
> > +			   &xsk->config.tx_size,
> > +			   sizeof(xsk->config.tx_size));
> 
> Instead of ignoring the error can you remember that setsockopt was done
> in struct xsk_socket and don't do it the second time?

Ideally we don't have to ignore the error. However in the event of failure struct xsk_socket is freed at the end of xsk_socket__create so we can't use it to remember state between subsequent calls to __create(). 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-29  8:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-26 14:29 [PATCH v2 bpf 0/3] AF_XDP Socket Creation Fixes Ciara Loftus
2021-03-26 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 bpf 1/3] libbpf: ensure umem pointer is non-NULL before dereferencing Ciara Loftus
2021-03-26 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 bpf 2/3] libbpf: restore umem state after socket create failure Ciara Loftus
2021-03-26 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 bpf 3/3] libbpf: ignore return values of setsockopt for XDP rings Ciara Loftus
2021-03-27  2:27   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-03-29  8:41     ` Loftus, Ciara [this message]
2021-03-29 15:28       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-03-30 12:04         ` Loftus, Ciara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bc1d9e861d27499da5f5a84bc6d22177@intel.com \
    --to=ciara.loftus@intel.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@gmail.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).