From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 263E05FB84; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:06:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.188 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706530007; cv=none; b=iRUJaQogulVEPkleX608q2ogFTBgdwSlqg1PkMFgB5n1Z7SFb3qHJiSduRpM0FkcXY/lpmgVLCjKdkiGyK3tWCJe04ueDPdUrzNnTID0SJtqLPWUF77t/1Ti/yFTAuFgWuXPuDXeg3L+I3T7GBUM2SrZgOuYoYSbJ9hMRgLAWP0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706530007; c=relaxed/simple; bh=t6LkJ01vvW/rXZtVIG+IWUs51vMwwbSUr66QJREtVlo=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=MDJ392A1VuXuk5XE/IBD3bW40QSzqWgu5u0X5efemetTIEpo4ilGx2AvpYrCigcJ1458cx7d2YCA6TrrOtaU66fIRfFgeJxmuj41kNd5on+iIb8+CGOG/4B/IZ9Mch2woEdxSdZqZNiW2cPCaQFiQeYtJPfO+ObqfINkU+zynR4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.188 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.194]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TNn702Bk4zXh0X; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 20:05:16 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.74]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 381FA1404F8; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 20:06:36 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.69.30.204] (10.69.30.204) by dggpemm500005.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.74) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 20:06:35 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 4/5] net: page_pool: make stats available just for global pools To: Lorenzo Bianconi , CC: , , , , , , , , , , , References: <9f0a571c1f322ff6c4e6facfd7d6d508e73a8f2f.1706451150.git.lorenzo@kernel.org> From: Yunsheng Lin Message-ID: Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 20:06:35 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9f0a571c1f322ff6c4e6facfd7d6d508e73a8f2f.1706451150.git.lorenzo@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To dggpemm500005.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.74) On 2024/1/28 22:20, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > Move page_pool stats allocation in page_pool_create routine and get rid > of it for percpu page_pools. Is there any reason why we do not need those kind stats for per cpu page_pool?