From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A3B717F378 for ; Tue, 14 May 2024 16:59:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715705999; cv=none; b=T2l0mDGYmovQtsWBWxckOK6mFS6HF2L2p7ypj65GrQqwbS1eCHr3YQjAVtwrxBKP6WKMS5D9t7l/8YH0R57pq2aiG0EYgA5/tEydk+hdjMUlBAmHTv7k7LoJ6cqkoOHF/w/AZ51f1MscbscRyv+5RjIK0bCqHRps/358yILUQX4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715705999; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3puDKRCrXC97Hh3eM9auD/+0l7RDPjAGfKBgxXpnnJU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=IFYJPyqcGEbNYs1AZTFnv2rPZy81D1jvp471r3ET0C9K2rEc0L3X4Zkt8TfoNU5OmEJx7mrklAHmj/WUa2ydWoBA7RqWDbqzz8J3cjPJSLZTIUODMhW5lM21brdw1/tbATPPau5JEDr9JI3cLCJad/gtjzLxxgnYEvMsAcJXDa4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=adm763xV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="adm763xV" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1715705997; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WB/G6KUfU+DCM/xaB8pIoFRp7BmXiyp1KdrOA+kE+Ck=; b=adm763xVbhDIu9P0Wa6tE46WXelwPmDDDWcoEG/ieiJezP5gz05EDkC9NCFyhP793ok46v BaA4542rmH6/GtRFVAvyhy6EQ6EsWftODPTgXA935vp1aFOU6nTjfklZAkv8pVM5OJKVpU ZyUny1r5EYYfJXeWcca31i2qGa4Nooc= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-310-rmFPpzH3MbKfVZSYz_h6VQ-1; Tue, 14 May 2024 12:59:53 -0400 X-MC-Unique: rmFPpzH3MbKfVZSYz_h6VQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A74538000A1; Tue, 14 May 2024 16:59:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.22.34.104] (unknown [10.22.34.104]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754515423E1; Tue, 14 May 2024 16:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 12:59:52 -0400 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] cgroup/rstat: add cgroup_rstat_cpu_lock helpers and tracepoints To: Tejun Heo , Jesper Dangaard Brouer Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, lizefan.x@bytedance.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, yosryahmed@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, kernel-team@cloudflare.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior References: <171457225108.4159924.12821205549807669839.stgit@firesoul> <0ef04a5c-ced8-4e30-bcde-43c218e35387@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Waiman Long In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.9 On 5/14/24 01:55, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 07:18:18AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: >> Hi Tejun, >> >> Could we please apply this for-6.10, to avoid splitting tracepoint changes >> over multiple kernel versions? > Yeah, I can. Waiman, would that be okay? I am OK with this commit as it shouldn't impose that much of a performance cost if the tracepoints are activated. Cheers, Longman