From: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Alex Marginean <alexandru.marginean@nxp.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@gmail.com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/4] net: phy: add USXGMII link partner ability constants
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 09:49:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <beb263ca1453c1505e8ddebdd92a1ba4@walle.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200715224449.hrqblfteshuknxon@skbuf>
Am 2020-07-16 00:44, schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:33:23PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
>> Am 2020-07-13 20:37, schrieb Michael Walle:
>> > Am 2020-07-13 20:23, schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux admin:
>> > > On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 11:35:23PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
>> > > > The constants are taken from the USXGMII Singleport Copper Interface
>> > > > specification. The naming are based on the SGMII ones, but with
>> > > > an MDIO_
>> > > > prefix.
>> > > >
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
>> > > > ---
>> > > > include/uapi/linux/mdio.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > > > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>> > > >
>> > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/mdio.h b/include/uapi/linux/mdio.h
>> > > > index 4bcb41c71b8c..784723072578 100644
>> > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/mdio.h
>> > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/mdio.h
>> > > > @@ -324,4 +324,30 @@ static inline __u16 mdio_phy_id_c45(int
>> > > > prtad, int devad)
>> > > > return MDIO_PHY_ID_C45 | (prtad << 5) | devad;
>> > > > }
>> > > >
>> > > > +/* UsxgmiiChannelInfo[15:0] for USXGMII in-band auto-negotiation.*/
>> > > > +#define MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_EEE_CLK_STP 0x0080 /* EEE clock stop
>> > > > supported */
>> > > > +#define MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_EEE 0x0100 /* EEE supported */
>> > > > +#define MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_SPD_MASK 0x0e00 /* USXGMII speed mask */
>> > > > +#define MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_FULL_DUPLEX 0x1000 /* USXGMII full
>> > > > duplex */
>> > > > +#define MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_DPX_SPD_MASK 0x1e00 /* USXGMII duplex
>> > > > and speed bits */
>> > > > +#define MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_10 0x0000 /* 10Mbps */
>> > > > +#define MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_10HALF 0x0000 /* 10Mbps half-duplex */
>> > > > +#define MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_10FULL 0x1000 /* 10Mbps full-duplex */
>> > > > +#define MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_100 0x0200 /* 100Mbps */
>> > > > +#define MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_100HALF 0x0200 /* 100Mbps half-duplex */
>> > > > +#define MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_100FULL 0x1200 /* 100Mbps full-duplex */
>> > > > +#define MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_1000 0x0400 /* 1000Mbps */
>> > > > +#define MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_1000HALF 0x0400 /* 1000Mbps half-duplex */
>> > > > +#define MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_1000FULL 0x1400 /* 1000Mbps full-duplex */
>> > > > +#define MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_10G 0x0600 /* 10Gbps */
>> > > > +#define MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_10GHALF 0x0600 /* 10Gbps half-duplex */
>> > > > +#define MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_10GFULL 0x1600 /* 10Gbps full-duplex */
>> > > > +#define MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_2500 0x0800 /* 2500Mbps */
>> > > > +#define MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_2500HALF 0x0800 /* 2500Mbps half-duplex */
>> > > > +#define MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_2500FULL 0x1800 /* 2500Mbps full-duplex */
>> > > > +#define MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_5000 0x0a00 /* 5000Mbps */
>> > > > +#define MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_5000HALF 0x0a00 /* 5000Mbps half-duplex */
>> > > > +#define MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_5000FULL 0x1a00 /* 5000Mbps full-duplex */
>> > > > +#define MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_LINK 0x8000 /* PHY link with
>> > > > copper-side partner */
>> > >
>> > > btw, the only thing which is missing from this is bit 0.
>> >
>> > TBH, I didn't know how to name it. Any suggestions?
>>
>> NXP calls it ABIL0, in xilinx docs its called USXGMII [1]. In the
>> USXGMII
>> spec, its "set to 1 (0 is SGMII)" which I don't understand because its
>> also 1 for SGMII, right? At least as described in the
>> tx_configReg[15:0] in
>> the SGMII spec.
>>
>> #define MDIO_USXGMII_USXGMII 0x0001 ?
>>
>> -michael
>>
>> [1]
>> https://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/ip_documentation/usxgmii/v1_0/pg251-usxgmii.pdf
>
> The explanation in the spec is quite cryptic, I've taken that to mean
> "corresponds to bit 0 in SGMII". Hence the reason why, in the code I've
> introduced in Felix, this is simply used as ADVERTISE_SGMII. I have no
> problem in creating an alias to ADVERTISE_SGMII named
> MDIO_LPA_USXGMII_SGMII. That being said, I don't see, right now, a
> practical situation where you might want to parse bit 0 from LPA, it's
> just like in Forrest Gump: "life is like a box of chocolates, you never
> know what you're gonna get". Adding it now to the UAPI might very well
> be a non-issue.
what about
#define MDIO_USXGMII_ADVERTISE 0x0001 /* must always be set */
Russell, do you agree? Then I'd send a new version with your
"Reviewed-by:".
-michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-16 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-09 21:35 [PATCH net-next v6 0/4] net: enetc: remove bootloader dependency Michael Walle
2020-07-09 21:35 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/4] net: phy: add USXGMII link partner ability constants Michael Walle
2020-07-13 16:34 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-13 17:01 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-13 17:07 ` Michael Walle
2020-07-13 18:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-07-13 18:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-07-13 18:37 ` Michael Walle
2020-07-15 20:33 ` Michael Walle
2020-07-15 22:44 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-16 7:49 ` Michael Walle [this message]
2020-07-09 21:35 ` [PATCH net-next v6 2/4] net: dsa: felix: (re)use already existing constants Michael Walle
2020-07-13 16:33 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-09 21:35 ` [PATCH net-next v6 3/4] net: enetc: Initialize SerDes for SGMII and USXGMII protocols Michael Walle
2020-07-13 16:38 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-09 21:35 ` [PATCH net-next v6 4/4] net: enetc: Use DT protocol information to set up the ports Michael Walle
2020-07-13 16:39 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-11 7:52 ` [PATCH net-next v6 0/4] net: enetc: remove bootloader dependency Vladimir Oltean
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=beb263ca1453c1505e8ddebdd92a1ba4@walle.cc \
--to=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=alexandru.marginean@nxp.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=heiko.thiery@gmail.com \
--cc=ioana.ciornei@nxp.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).