From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] net: phy: fix phy_ethtool_set_eee() incorrectly enabling LPI
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 09:44:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bedf2521-dcbf-4b5b-8482-9436a54a614f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1tErSe-005RhB-2R@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk>
Hi,
On 11/23/24 15:50, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> When phy_ethtool_set_eee_noneg() detects a change in the LPI
> parameters, it attempts to update phylib state and trigger the link
> to cycle so the MAC sees the updated parameters.
>
> However, in doing so, it sets phydev->enable_tx_lpi depending on
> whether the EEE configuration allows the MAC to generate LPI without
> taking into account the result of negotiation.
>
> This can be demonstrated with a 1000base-T FD interface by:
>
> # ethtool --set-eee eno0 advertise 8 # cause EEE to be not negotiated
> # ethtool --set-eee eno0 tx-lpi off
> # ethtool --set-eee eno0 tx-lpi on
>
> This results in being true, despite EEE not having been negotiated and:
> # ethtool --show-eee eno0
> EEE status: enabled - inactive
> Tx LPI: 250 (us)
> Supported EEE link modes: 100baseT/Full
> 1000baseT/Full
> Advertised EEE link modes: 100baseT/Full
> 1000baseT/Full
>
> Fix this by keeping track of whether EEE was negotiated via a new
> eee_active member in struct phy_device, and include this state in
> the decision whether phydev->enable_tx_lpi should be set.
>
> Fixes: 3e43b903da04 ("net: phy: Immediately call adjust_link if only tx_lpi_enabled changes")
> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
This patch did not apply net cleanly to net tree when it was submitted,
due to its dependency. As a result it did not went through the CI tests.
Currently there is little material there phy specific - mostly builds
with different Kconfigs - but with time we hope to increase H/W coverage.
AFAICS this patch has no kconfig implication, so my local build should
be a safe-enough test, but please wait for the pre-reqs being merged for
future submissions.
Thanks,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-28 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-23 14:50 [PATCH net v3] net: phy: fix phy_ethtool_set_eee() incorrectly enabling LPI Russell King (Oracle)
2024-11-28 8:44 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2024-11-28 11:13 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-11-28 12:08 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-11-28 8:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bedf2521-dcbf-4b5b-8482-9436a54a614f@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).