From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CA92E573 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 09:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731575170; cv=none; b=AN1WFG/TM5L6g4wy4jCn67GiVJZh4vWWz15piizPyOTnAFq9RgWZjwa6LEemznvj8PKoZnDtMoEbq7fseo5JdJUbWGQSLYwiSyESIPDp08KAjFJsv9w92zAp9M3QJeYDBMWSOx0XNAK5W7aXRZqhZZdybtA7Oz1lQLfamP5gKWU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731575170; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aFILYSe1c8y2SA8XZwkqPjVURhldMo/+d5BMIpxd1Z4=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=FHFFT1jO+LX5Ys2bHjsyTHa745oBZaCywmvCHaZLg0Y2d96rEeZ37+NowYJ/yFVFhjqNZRLs8ZWefG1hz6NHyew1OzFMDwCttlRnN0CUPj3zueAJBusewvpUgk9RZOq1QqeRY6/M+RXpiNBlW0lAPLwereyBm/Bxop5tcZ6swf0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=YHE2PumO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="YHE2PumO" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1731575168; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gk4fvCl2AelIitnEUCkAjtoqB7Mo6yKzoNwrEKOPpYQ=; b=YHE2PumOi56pFxDfNzju0Ds8UpsXcwqXwi3KGcUlJUz5I27OtnUaeD2DaJ+G1q73e94ksp ml1xQ4h+tVIO3AUNLJsDrme32KP/7wDOdnp3M+W+xAuhiwxogN9eIDjVxsFzQh+co7WKsQ 5qnko81JSrJMV3neujMurZIuCGJ8ha8= Received: from mail-oi1-f199.google.com (mail-oi1-f199.google.com [209.85.167.199]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-561-vHrB1yxWMY2hwxdYQUZDdQ-1; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 04:06:07 -0500 X-MC-Unique: vHrB1yxWMY2hwxdYQUZDdQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: vHrB1yxWMY2hwxdYQUZDdQ Received: by mail-oi1-f199.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3e60970ed1dso399857b6e.0 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 01:06:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1731575166; x=1732179966; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gk4fvCl2AelIitnEUCkAjtoqB7Mo6yKzoNwrEKOPpYQ=; b=YfRVZ11vdoRS7Qbq8ik6Y4jvohuZnlR10OLKntnOKsw9+n7sceK5SFtpBg4XNODPFt RGZFwhd037njX4GCBCiKCTA2A3zf+uzr5IpzsloqlTlYXNrbAX6Pi+wK2u/CogESBjhw M5lXS3dBfuVl1C1CvP2YFnGCw2eUoSG+ihnojmIF8Y7jIk6bNU7yJWW90mPYrkuAwNq3 HvrIoWNkesUZJA98MzbPauoLfgjqvknO48K12P7+Xzx59NHquX/trbDL6pQzBcIP8rKk Z1n+fAI6rbADBfwkUamuSMGDlwH1e+JS5/bRXET45aMnM7iRU7Oc3AlZzyy4VdwVIhMt /YzA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWW6ZaFxIkUhMBRQwnJ6CwO30OVbp/3eL1pTGgIrzhu4p+leknusXtoaqEI9PjCYUiluV1wAbU=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzYuz7ttPR+rVExSaNci5ezN3ilwUc/daJ8/J3mK7BSNV3YFebJ Ld1mHXjLFD0s+gNONioWmETIw77EECbtjnkfFXiHbJpUlg6hxXnmpi/U9JsHOBYJ350J7QqlDwA InPK+zZwFMCu73YW/w9lzX7xgMiQUXtGDKo9cCG89lXdPJOOcNnk2/A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1986:b0:3e5:f43a:5d77 with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3e7b0ae1e37mr5537412b6e.42.1731575166372; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 01:06:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFJjqamCyS7gbasbpR+3EbOmIKtyYOg8obpLq/VvCFTX5e8vsr5EFqGrfeUbWedvmAQvmsXTg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1986:b0:3e5:f43a:5d77 with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3e7b0ae1e37mr5537394b6e.42.1731575166037; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 01:06:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.88.24] (146-241-44-112.dyn.eolo.it. [146.241.44.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6a1803df08f44-6d3ee933d15sm3223896d6.119.2024.11.14.01.06.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Nov 2024 01:06:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 10:06:02 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [net v2 0/2] Fix rcu_read_lock issues in netdev-genl To: Joe Damato , Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, amritha.nambiar@intel.com, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com, mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca, "David S. Miller" , open list , Mina Almasry , Simon Horman References: <20241113021755.11125-1-jdamato@fastly.com> <20241113184735.28416e41@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Paolo Abeni In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/14/24 07:29, Joe Damato wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 06:47:35PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 02:17:50 +0000 Joe Damato wrote: >>> base-commit: a58f00ed24b849d449f7134fd5d86f07090fe2f5 >> >> which is a net-next commit.. please rebase on net > > I thought I asked about this in the previous thread, but I probably > wasn't clear with my question. > > Let me try again: > > Patch 1 will apply to net and is a fixes and CC's stable, and fixes > a similar issue to the one Paolo reported, not the exact same path, > though. > > Patch 2 will not apply to net, because the code it fixes is not in > net yet. This fixes the splat Paolo reported. > > So... back to the question in the cover letter from the RFC :) I > suppose the right thing to do is split the series: > > - Rebase patch 1 on net (it applies as is) and send it on its own > - Send patch 2 on its own against net-next > > Or... something else ? I'm sorry for the late reply. Please send the two patch separately, patch 1 targeting (and rebased on) net and patch 2 targeting (and based on) net-next. Thanks! Paolo