public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/3] tcp: make tcp_v{4,6}_send_check() static: manual merge
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 12:57:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf7df838-7337-4ef8-b0c4-492f9c9bced7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260223100729.3761597-4-edumazet@google.com>

Hi Eric,

Thank you for the patch!

On 23/02/2026 11:07, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> tcp_v{4,6}_send_check() are only called from tcp_output.c
> and should be made static so that the compiler does not need
> to put an out of line copy of them.
> 
> Remove (struct inet_connection_sock_af_ops) send_check field
> and use instead @net_header_len.
> 
> Move @net_header_len close to @queue_xmit for data locality
> as both are used in TCP tx fast path.

(...)
> diff --git a/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h b/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h
> index ecb362025c4e5183ec78aef4b45c249da87c19ea..bbc9355871c767b51e3d1a4d2436022a8556416c 100644
> --- a/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h
> +++ b/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ struct tcp_congestion_ops;
>   */
>  struct inet_connection_sock_af_ops {
>  	int	    (*queue_xmit)(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl);
> -	void	    (*send_check)(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
> +	u16	    net_header_len;
>  	int	    (*rebuild_header)(struct sock *sk);
>  	void	    (*sk_rx_dst_set)(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb);
>  	int	    (*conn_request)(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
> @@ -43,7 +43,6 @@ struct inet_connection_sock_af_ops {
>  				      struct dst_entry *dst,
>  				      struct request_sock *req_unhash,
>  				      bool *own_req);
> -	u16	    net_header_len;

FYI, I got a small conflict when merging 'net' in 'net-next' in the
MPTCP tree due to this patch applied in 'net':

  858d2a4f67ff ("tcp: fix potential race in tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock()")

and this one from 'net-next':

  fcd3d039fab6 ("tcp: make tcp_v{4,6}_send_check() static")

The conflict was in the context: here 'net_header_len' has been moved,
while in net-next, the line above has been modified. I'm sharing the 3w
patch resolving the conflict, just in case it can help others. Rerere
cache is available as well:

 https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-rr-cache/commit/d58bc4b

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.

------------------------ 8< ------------------------
diff --cc include/net/inet_connection_sock.h
index 5cb3056d6ddc,bbc9355871c7..433c2df23076
--- a/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h
+++ b/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h
@@@ -42,10 -42,7 +42,9 @@@ struct inet_connection_sock_af_ops 
  				      struct request_sock *req,
  				      struct dst_entry *dst,
  				      struct request_sock *req_unhash,
 -				      bool *own_req);
 +				      bool *own_req,
 +				      void (*opt_child_init)(struct sock *newsk,
 +							     const struct sock *sk));
- 	u16	    net_header_len;
  	int	    (*setsockopt)(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
  				  sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen);
  	int	    (*getsockopt)(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
------------------------ 8< ------------------------

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-25 11:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-23 10:07 [PATCH v2 net-next 0/3] tcp: rework tcp_v{4,6}_send_check() Eric Dumazet
2026-02-23 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/3] tcp: inline __tcp_v4_send_check() Eric Dumazet
2026-02-23 18:50   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-02-23 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 2/3] tcp: move tcp_v6_send_check() to tcp_output.c Eric Dumazet
2026-02-23 18:53   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-02-23 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 3/3] tcp: make tcp_v{4,6}_send_check() static Eric Dumazet
2026-02-23 18:55   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-02-25 11:57   ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2026-02-25  1:50 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 0/3] tcp: rework tcp_v{4,6}_send_check() patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bf7df838-7337-4ef8-b0c4-492f9c9bced7@kernel.org \
    --to=matttbe@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox