* [PATCH v2] net: e1000e: convert to ndo_hwtstamp_get() and ndo_hwtstamp_set()
@ 2025-02-08 15:43 Piotr Wejman
2025-02-10 9:13 ` Vadim Fedorenko
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Piotr Wejman @ 2025-02-08 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tony Nguyen, Przemek Kitszel, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, intel-wired-lan,
netdev, linux-kernel
Cc: Piotr Wejman
Update the driver to use the new hardware timestamping API added in commit
66f7223039c0 ("net: add NDOs for configuring hardware timestamping").
Use Netlink extack for error reporting in e1000e_hwtstamp_set.
Align the indentation of net_device_ops.
Signed-off-by: Piotr Wejman <wejmanpm@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- amend commit message
- use extack for error reporting
- rename e1000_mii_ioctl to e1000_ioctl
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250202170839.47375-1-piotrwejman90@gmail.com/
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h | 2 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 68 ++++++++++------------
2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h
index ba9c19e6994c..952898151565 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ struct e1000_adapter {
u16 tx_ring_count;
u16 rx_ring_count;
- struct hwtstamp_config hwtstamp_config;
+ struct kernel_hwtstamp_config hwtstamp_config;
struct delayed_work systim_overflow_work;
struct sk_buff *tx_hwtstamp_skb;
unsigned long tx_hwtstamp_start;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
index 286155efcedf..43933e64819b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -3574,6 +3574,7 @@ s32 e1000e_get_base_timinca(struct e1000_adapter *adapter, u32 *timinca)
* e1000e_config_hwtstamp - configure the hwtstamp registers and enable/disable
* @adapter: board private structure
* @config: timestamp configuration
+ * @extack: netlink extended ACK for error report
*
* Outgoing time stamping can be enabled and disabled. Play nice and
* disable it when requested, although it shouldn't cause any overhead
@@ -3587,7 +3588,8 @@ s32 e1000e_get_base_timinca(struct e1000_adapter *adapter, u32 *timinca)
* exception of "all V2 events regardless of level 2 or 4".
**/
static int e1000e_config_hwtstamp(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
- struct hwtstamp_config *config)
+ struct kernel_hwtstamp_config *config,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
u32 tsync_tx_ctl = E1000_TSYNCTXCTL_ENABLED;
@@ -3598,8 +3600,10 @@ static int e1000e_config_hwtstamp(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
bool is_l2 = false;
u32 regval;
- if (!(adapter->flags & FLAG_HAS_HW_TIMESTAMP))
+ if (!(adapter->flags & FLAG_HAS_HW_TIMESTAMP)) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "No HW timestamp support\n");
return -EINVAL;
+ }
switch (config->tx_type) {
case HWTSTAMP_TX_OFF:
@@ -3608,6 +3612,7 @@ static int e1000e_config_hwtstamp(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
case HWTSTAMP_TX_ON:
break;
default:
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Unsupported TX HW timestamp type\n");
return -ERANGE;
}
@@ -3681,6 +3686,7 @@ static int e1000e_config_hwtstamp(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
config->rx_filter = HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL;
break;
default:
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Unsupported RX HW timestamp filter\n");
return -ERANGE;
}
@@ -3693,7 +3699,7 @@ static int e1000e_config_hwtstamp(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
ew32(TSYNCTXCTL, regval);
if ((er32(TSYNCTXCTL) & E1000_TSYNCTXCTL_ENABLED) !=
(regval & E1000_TSYNCTXCTL_ENABLED)) {
- e_err("Timesync Tx Control register not set as expected\n");
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Timesync Tx Control register not set as expected\n");
return -EAGAIN;
}
@@ -3706,7 +3712,7 @@ static int e1000e_config_hwtstamp(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
E1000_TSYNCRXCTL_TYPE_MASK)) !=
(regval & (E1000_TSYNCRXCTL_ENABLED |
E1000_TSYNCRXCTL_TYPE_MASK))) {
- e_err("Timesync Rx Control register not set as expected\n");
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Timesync Rx Control register not set as expected\n");
return -EAGAIN;
}
@@ -3932,7 +3938,7 @@ static void e1000e_systim_reset(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->systim_lock, flags);
/* restore the previous hwtstamp configuration settings */
- e1000e_config_hwtstamp(adapter, &adapter->hwtstamp_config);
+ e1000e_config_hwtstamp(adapter, &adapter->hwtstamp_config, NULL);
}
/**
@@ -6079,8 +6085,8 @@ static int e1000_change_mtu(struct net_device *netdev, int new_mtu)
return 0;
}
-static int e1000_mii_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr,
- int cmd)
+static int e1000_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr,
+ int cmd)
{
struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
struct mii_ioctl_data *data = if_mii(ifr);
@@ -6140,7 +6146,8 @@ static int e1000_mii_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr,
/**
* e1000e_hwtstamp_set - control hardware time stamping
* @netdev: network interface device structure
- * @ifr: interface request
+ * @config: timestamp configuration
+ * @extack: netlink extended ACK report
*
* Outgoing time stamping can be enabled and disabled. Play nice and
* disable it when requested, although it shouldn't cause any overhead
@@ -6153,20 +6160,18 @@ static int e1000_mii_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr,
* specified. Matching the kind of event packet is not supported, with the
* exception of "all V2 events regardless of level 2 or 4".
**/
-static int e1000e_hwtstamp_set(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr)
+static int e1000e_hwtstamp_set(struct net_device *netdev,
+ struct kernel_hwtstamp_config *config,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
- struct hwtstamp_config config;
int ret_val;
- if (copy_from_user(&config, ifr->ifr_data, sizeof(config)))
- return -EFAULT;
-
- ret_val = e1000e_config_hwtstamp(adapter, &config);
+ ret_val = e1000e_config_hwtstamp(adapter, config, extack);
if (ret_val)
return ret_val;
- switch (config.rx_filter) {
+ switch (config->rx_filter) {
case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L4_SYNC:
case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L2_SYNC:
case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_SYNC:
@@ -6178,38 +6183,23 @@ static int e1000e_hwtstamp_set(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr)
* by hardware so notify the caller the requested packets plus
* some others are time stamped.
*/
- config.rx_filter = HWTSTAMP_FILTER_SOME;
+ config->rx_filter = HWTSTAMP_FILTER_SOME;
break;
default:
break;
}
- return copy_to_user(ifr->ifr_data, &config,
- sizeof(config)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
+ return 0;
}
-static int e1000e_hwtstamp_get(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr)
+static int e1000e_hwtstamp_get(struct net_device *netdev,
+ struct kernel_hwtstamp_config *kernel_config)
{
struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
- return copy_to_user(ifr->ifr_data, &adapter->hwtstamp_config,
- sizeof(adapter->hwtstamp_config)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
-}
+ *kernel_config = adapter->hwtstamp_config;
-static int e1000_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd)
-{
- switch (cmd) {
- case SIOCGMIIPHY:
- case SIOCGMIIREG:
- case SIOCSMIIREG:
- return e1000_mii_ioctl(netdev, ifr, cmd);
- case SIOCSHWTSTAMP:
- return e1000e_hwtstamp_set(netdev, ifr);
- case SIOCGHWTSTAMP:
- return e1000e_hwtstamp_get(netdev, ifr);
- default:
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- }
+ return 0;
}
static int e1000_init_phy_wakeup(struct e1000_adapter *adapter, u32 wufc)
@@ -7346,9 +7336,11 @@ static const struct net_device_ops e1000e_netdev_ops = {
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
.ndo_poll_controller = e1000_netpoll,
#endif
- .ndo_set_features = e1000_set_features,
- .ndo_fix_features = e1000_fix_features,
+ .ndo_set_features = e1000_set_features,
+ .ndo_fix_features = e1000_fix_features,
.ndo_features_check = passthru_features_check,
+ .ndo_hwtstamp_get = e1000e_hwtstamp_get,
+ .ndo_hwtstamp_set = e1000e_hwtstamp_set,
};
/**
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] net: e1000e: convert to ndo_hwtstamp_get() and ndo_hwtstamp_set()
2025-02-08 15:43 [PATCH v2] net: e1000e: convert to ndo_hwtstamp_get() and ndo_hwtstamp_set() Piotr Wejman
@ 2025-02-10 9:13 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2025-02-10 14:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-12 14:07 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Lifshits, Vitaly
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vadim Fedorenko @ 2025-02-10 9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Piotr Wejman, Tony Nguyen, Przemek Kitszel, Andrew Lunn,
David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
intel-wired-lan, netdev, linux-kernel
On 08/02/2025 15:43, Piotr Wejman wrote:
> Update the driver to use the new hardware timestamping API added in commit
> 66f7223039c0 ("net: add NDOs for configuring hardware timestamping").
> Use Netlink extack for error reporting in e1000e_hwtstamp_set.
> Align the indentation of net_device_ops.
>
> Signed-off-by: Piotr Wejman <wejmanpm@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - amend commit message
> - use extack for error reporting
> - rename e1000_mii_ioctl to e1000_ioctl
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250202170839.47375-1-piotrwejman90@gmail.com/
>
Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] net: e1000e: convert to ndo_hwtstamp_get() and ndo_hwtstamp_set()
2025-02-08 15:43 [PATCH v2] net: e1000e: convert to ndo_hwtstamp_get() and ndo_hwtstamp_set() Piotr Wejman
2025-02-10 9:13 ` Vadim Fedorenko
@ 2025-02-10 14:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-12 14:07 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Lifshits, Vitaly
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2025-02-10 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Piotr Wejman
Cc: Tony Nguyen, Przemek Kitszel, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Paolo Abeni, intel-wired-lan, netdev, linux-kernel
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 16:43:49 +0100 Piotr Wejman wrote:
> - if (!(adapter->flags & FLAG_HAS_HW_TIMESTAMP))
> + if (!(adapter->flags & FLAG_HAS_HW_TIMESTAMP)) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "No HW timestamp support\n");
No new lines at the end of extack messages, please.
User space adds its own line breaks.
--
pw-bot: cr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] net: e1000e: convert to ndo_hwtstamp_get() and ndo_hwtstamp_set()
2025-02-08 15:43 [PATCH v2] net: e1000e: convert to ndo_hwtstamp_get() and ndo_hwtstamp_set() Piotr Wejman
2025-02-10 9:13 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2025-02-10 14:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2025-02-12 14:07 ` Lifshits, Vitaly
2025-02-12 22:32 ` Piotr Wejman
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Lifshits, Vitaly @ 2025-02-12 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Piotr Wejman, Tony Nguyen, Przemek Kitszel, Andrew Lunn,
David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
intel-wired-lan, netdev, linux-kernel
On 2/8/2025 5:43 PM, Piotr Wejman wrote:
> Update the driver to use the new hardware timestamping API added in commit
> 66f7223039c0 ("net: add NDOs for configuring hardware timestamping").
> Use Netlink extack for error reporting in e1000e_hwtstamp_set.
> Align the indentation of net_device_ops.
>
> Signed-off-by: Piotr Wejman <wejmanpm@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - amend commit message
> - use extack for error reporting
> - rename e1000_mii_ioctl to e1000_ioctl
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250202170839.47375-1-piotrwejman90@gmail.com/
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h | 2 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 68 ++++++++++------------
> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h
> index ba9c19e6994c..952898151565 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h
> @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ struct e1000_adapter {
> u16 tx_ring_count;
> u16 rx_ring_count;
>
> - struct hwtstamp_config hwtstamp_config;
> + struct kernel_hwtstamp_config hwtstamp_config;
> struct delayed_work systim_overflow_work;
> struct sk_buff *tx_hwtstamp_skb;
> unsigned long tx_hwtstamp_start;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> index 286155efcedf..43933e64819b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> @@ -3574,6 +3574,7 @@ s32 e1000e_get_base_timinca(struct e1000_adapter *adapter, u32 *timinca)
> * e1000e_config_hwtstamp - configure the hwtstamp registers and enable/disable
> * @adapter: board private structure
> * @config: timestamp configuration
> + * @extack: netlink extended ACK for error report
> *
> * Outgoing time stamping can be enabled and disabled. Play nice and
> * disable it when requested, although it shouldn't cause any overhead
> @@ -3587,7 +3588,8 @@ s32 e1000e_get_base_timinca(struct e1000_adapter *adapter, u32 *timinca)
> * exception of "all V2 events regardless of level 2 or 4".
> **/
> static int e1000e_config_hwtstamp(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
> - struct hwtstamp_config *config)
> + struct kernel_hwtstamp_config *config,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
> u32 tsync_tx_ctl = E1000_TSYNCTXCTL_ENABLED;
> @@ -3598,8 +3600,10 @@ static int e1000e_config_hwtstamp(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
> bool is_l2 = false;
> u32 regval;
>
> - if (!(adapter->flags & FLAG_HAS_HW_TIMESTAMP))
> + if (!(adapter->flags & FLAG_HAS_HW_TIMESTAMP)) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "No HW timestamp support\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> switch (config->tx_type) {
> case HWTSTAMP_TX_OFF:
> @@ -3608,6 +3612,7 @@ static int e1000e_config_hwtstamp(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
> case HWTSTAMP_TX_ON:
> break;
> default:
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Unsupported TX HW timestamp type\n");
> return -ERANGE;
> }
>
> @@ -3681,6 +3686,7 @@ static int e1000e_config_hwtstamp(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
> config->rx_filter = HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL;
> break;
> default:
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Unsupported RX HW timestamp filter\n");
> return -ERANGE;
> }
>
> @@ -3693,7 +3699,7 @@ static int e1000e_config_hwtstamp(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
> ew32(TSYNCTXCTL, regval);
> if ((er32(TSYNCTXCTL) & E1000_TSYNCTXCTL_ENABLED) !=
> (regval & E1000_TSYNCTXCTL_ENABLED)) {
> - e_err("Timesync Tx Control register not set as expected\n");
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Timesync Tx Control register not set as expected\n");
In the case where this function is being called from e1000e_systim_reset
function, won't it cause this debug print to do nothing?
> return -EAGAIN;
> }
>
> @@ -3706,7 +3712,7 @@ static int e1000e_config_hwtstamp(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
> E1000_TSYNCRXCTL_TYPE_MASK)) !=
> (regval & (E1000_TSYNCRXCTL_ENABLED |
> E1000_TSYNCRXCTL_TYPE_MASK))) {
> - e_err("Timesync Rx Control register not set as expected\n");
Same question here.
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Timesync Rx Control register not set as expected\n");
> return -EAGAIN;
> }
>
> @@ -3932,7 +3938,7 @@ static void e1000e_systim_reset(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->systim_lock, flags);
>
> /* restore the previous hwtstamp configuration settings */
> - e1000e_config_hwtstamp(adapter, &adapter->hwtstamp_config);
> + e1000e_config_hwtstamp(adapter, &adapter->hwtstamp_config, NULL);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -6079,8 +6085,8 @@ static int e1000_change_mtu(struct net_device *netdev, int new_mtu)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int e1000_mii_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr,
> - int cmd)
> +static int e1000_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr,
> + int cmd)
> {
> struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> struct mii_ioctl_data *data = if_mii(ifr);
> @@ -6140,7 +6146,8 @@ static int e1000_mii_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr,
> /**
> * e1000e_hwtstamp_set - control hardware time stamping
> * @netdev: network interface device structure
> - * @ifr: interface request
> + * @config: timestamp configuration
> + * @extack: netlink extended ACK report
> *
> * Outgoing time stamping can be enabled and disabled. Play nice and
> * disable it when requested, although it shouldn't cause any overhead
> @@ -6153,20 +6160,18 @@ static int e1000_mii_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr,
> * specified. Matching the kind of event packet is not supported, with the
> * exception of "all V2 events regardless of level 2 or 4".
> **/
> -static int e1000e_hwtstamp_set(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr)
> +static int e1000e_hwtstamp_set(struct net_device *netdev,
> + struct kernel_hwtstamp_config *config,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> - struct hwtstamp_config config;
> int ret_val;
>
> - if (copy_from_user(&config, ifr->ifr_data, sizeof(config)))
> - return -EFAULT;
> -
> - ret_val = e1000e_config_hwtstamp(adapter, &config);
> + ret_val = e1000e_config_hwtstamp(adapter, config, extack);
> if (ret_val)
> return ret_val;
>
> - switch (config.rx_filter) {
> + switch (config->rx_filter) {
> case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L4_SYNC:
> case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L2_SYNC:
> case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_SYNC:
> @@ -6178,38 +6183,23 @@ static int e1000e_hwtstamp_set(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr)
> * by hardware so notify the caller the requested packets plus
> * some others are time stamped.
> */
> - config.rx_filter = HWTSTAMP_FILTER_SOME;
> + config->rx_filter = HWTSTAMP_FILTER_SOME;
> break;
> default:
> break;
> }
>
> - return copy_to_user(ifr->ifr_data, &config,
> - sizeof(config)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> -static int e1000e_hwtstamp_get(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr)
> +static int e1000e_hwtstamp_get(struct net_device *netdev,
> + struct kernel_hwtstamp_config *kernel_config)
> {
> struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
>
> - return copy_to_user(ifr->ifr_data, &adapter->hwtstamp_config,
> - sizeof(adapter->hwtstamp_config)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> -}
> + *kernel_config = adapter->hwtstamp_config;
>
> -static int e1000_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd)
> -{
> - switch (cmd) {
> - case SIOCGMIIPHY:
> - case SIOCGMIIREG:
> - case SIOCSMIIREG:
> - return e1000_mii_ioctl(netdev, ifr, cmd);
> - case SIOCSHWTSTAMP:
> - return e1000e_hwtstamp_set(netdev, ifr);
> - case SIOCGHWTSTAMP:
> - return e1000e_hwtstamp_get(netdev, ifr);
> - default:
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> - }
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int e1000_init_phy_wakeup(struct e1000_adapter *adapter, u32 wufc)
> @@ -7346,9 +7336,11 @@ static const struct net_device_ops e1000e_netdev_ops = {
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
> .ndo_poll_controller = e1000_netpoll,
> #endif
> - .ndo_set_features = e1000_set_features,
> - .ndo_fix_features = e1000_fix_features,
> + .ndo_set_features = e1000_set_features,
> + .ndo_fix_features = e1000_fix_features,
> .ndo_features_check = passthru_features_check,
> + .ndo_hwtstamp_get = e1000e_hwtstamp_get,
> + .ndo_hwtstamp_set = e1000e_hwtstamp_set,
> };
>
> /**
>
Also you are missing a subject prefix, I assume that you mean to send it
to iwl-next since it is not a bug fix. Please add it to your patch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] net: e1000e: convert to ndo_hwtstamp_get() and ndo_hwtstamp_set()
2025-02-12 14:07 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Lifshits, Vitaly
@ 2025-02-12 22:32 ` Piotr Wejman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Piotr Wejman @ 2025-02-12 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lifshits, Vitaly
Cc: Tony Nguyen, Przemek Kitszel, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, intel-wired-lan,
netdev, linux-kernel
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 3:10 PM Lifshits, Vitaly
<vitaly.lifshits@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/8/2025 5:43 PM, Piotr Wejman wrote:
> > Update the driver to use the new hardware timestamping API added in commit
> > 66f7223039c0 ("net: add NDOs for configuring hardware timestamping").
> > Use Netlink extack for error reporting in e1000e_hwtstamp_set.
> > Align the indentation of net_device_ops.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Piotr Wejman <wejmanpm@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - amend commit message
> > - use extack for error reporting
> > - rename e1000_mii_ioctl to e1000_ioctl
> > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250202170839.47375-1-piotrwejman90@gmail.com/
> >
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h | 2 +-
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 68 ++++++++++------------
> > 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h
> > index ba9c19e6994c..952898151565 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h
> > @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ struct e1000_adapter {
> > u16 tx_ring_count;
> > u16 rx_ring_count;
> >
> > - struct hwtstamp_config hwtstamp_config;
> > + struct kernel_hwtstamp_config hwtstamp_config;
> > struct delayed_work systim_overflow_work;
> > struct sk_buff *tx_hwtstamp_skb;
> > unsigned long tx_hwtstamp_start;
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > index 286155efcedf..43933e64819b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > @@ -3574,6 +3574,7 @@ s32 e1000e_get_base_timinca(struct e1000_adapter *adapter, u32 *timinca)
> > * e1000e_config_hwtstamp - configure the hwtstamp registers and enable/disable
> > * @adapter: board private structure
> > * @config: timestamp configuration
> > + * @extack: netlink extended ACK for error report
> > *
> > * Outgoing time stamping can be enabled and disabled. Play nice and
> > * disable it when requested, although it shouldn't cause any overhead
> > @@ -3587,7 +3588,8 @@ s32 e1000e_get_base_timinca(struct e1000_adapter *adapter, u32 *timinca)
> > * exception of "all V2 events regardless of level 2 or 4".
> > **/
> > static int e1000e_config_hwtstamp(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
> > - struct hwtstamp_config *config)
> > + struct kernel_hwtstamp_config *config,
> > + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> > {
> > struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
> > u32 tsync_tx_ctl = E1000_TSYNCTXCTL_ENABLED;
> > @@ -3598,8 +3600,10 @@ static int e1000e_config_hwtstamp(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
> > bool is_l2 = false;
> > u32 regval;
> >
> > - if (!(adapter->flags & FLAG_HAS_HW_TIMESTAMP))
> > + if (!(adapter->flags & FLAG_HAS_HW_TIMESTAMP)) {
> > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "No HW timestamp support\n");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> >
> > switch (config->tx_type) {
> > case HWTSTAMP_TX_OFF:
> > @@ -3608,6 +3612,7 @@ static int e1000e_config_hwtstamp(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
> > case HWTSTAMP_TX_ON:
> > break;
> > default:
> > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Unsupported TX HW timestamp type\n");
> > return -ERANGE;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -3681,6 +3686,7 @@ static int e1000e_config_hwtstamp(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
> > config->rx_filter = HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL;
> > break;
> > default:
> > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Unsupported RX HW timestamp filter\n");
> > return -ERANGE;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -3693,7 +3699,7 @@ static int e1000e_config_hwtstamp(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
> > ew32(TSYNCTXCTL, regval);
> > if ((er32(TSYNCTXCTL) & E1000_TSYNCTXCTL_ENABLED) !=
> > (regval & E1000_TSYNCTXCTL_ENABLED)) {
> > - e_err("Timesync Tx Control register not set as expected\n");
> > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Timesync Tx Control register not set as expected\n");
>
> In the case where this function is being called from e1000e_systim_reset
> function, won't it cause this debug print to do nothing?
Yes, you're right.
>
> > return -EAGAIN;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -3706,7 +3712,7 @@ static int e1000e_config_hwtstamp(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
> > E1000_TSYNCRXCTL_TYPE_MASK)) !=
> > (regval & (E1000_TSYNCRXCTL_ENABLED |
> > E1000_TSYNCRXCTL_TYPE_MASK))) {
> > - e_err("Timesync Rx Control register not set as expected\n");
>
> Same question here.
>
> > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Timesync Rx Control register not set as expected\n");
> > return -EAGAIN;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -3932,7 +3938,7 @@ static void e1000e_systim_reset(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->systim_lock, flags);
> >
> > /* restore the previous hwtstamp configuration settings */
> > - e1000e_config_hwtstamp(adapter, &adapter->hwtstamp_config);
> > + e1000e_config_hwtstamp(adapter, &adapter->hwtstamp_config, NULL);
I'll pass an extack instead of NULL and add a print here.
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -6079,8 +6085,8 @@ static int e1000_change_mtu(struct net_device *netdev, int new_mtu)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static int e1000_mii_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr,
> > - int cmd)
> > +static int e1000_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr,
> > + int cmd)
> > {
> > struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > struct mii_ioctl_data *data = if_mii(ifr);
> > @@ -6140,7 +6146,8 @@ static int e1000_mii_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr,
> > /**
> > * e1000e_hwtstamp_set - control hardware time stamping
> > * @netdev: network interface device structure
> > - * @ifr: interface request
> > + * @config: timestamp configuration
> > + * @extack: netlink extended ACK report
> > *
> > * Outgoing time stamping can be enabled and disabled. Play nice and
> > * disable it when requested, although it shouldn't cause any overhead
> > @@ -6153,20 +6160,18 @@ static int e1000_mii_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr,
> > * specified. Matching the kind of event packet is not supported, with the
> > * exception of "all V2 events regardless of level 2 or 4".
> > **/
> > -static int e1000e_hwtstamp_set(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr)
> > +static int e1000e_hwtstamp_set(struct net_device *netdev,
> > + struct kernel_hwtstamp_config *config,
> > + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> > {
> > struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > - struct hwtstamp_config config;
> > int ret_val;
> >
> > - if (copy_from_user(&config, ifr->ifr_data, sizeof(config)))
> > - return -EFAULT;
> > -
> > - ret_val = e1000e_config_hwtstamp(adapter, &config);
> > + ret_val = e1000e_config_hwtstamp(adapter, config, extack);
> > if (ret_val)
> > return ret_val;
> >
> > - switch (config.rx_filter) {
> > + switch (config->rx_filter) {
> > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L4_SYNC:
> > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L2_SYNC:
> > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_SYNC:
> > @@ -6178,38 +6183,23 @@ static int e1000e_hwtstamp_set(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr)
> > * by hardware so notify the caller the requested packets plus
> > * some others are time stamped.
> > */
> > - config.rx_filter = HWTSTAMP_FILTER_SOME;
> > + config->rx_filter = HWTSTAMP_FILTER_SOME;
> > break;
> > default:
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > - return copy_to_user(ifr->ifr_data, &config,
> > - sizeof(config)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static int e1000e_hwtstamp_get(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr)
> > +static int e1000e_hwtstamp_get(struct net_device *netdev,
> > + struct kernel_hwtstamp_config *kernel_config)
> > {
> > struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> >
> > - return copy_to_user(ifr->ifr_data, &adapter->hwtstamp_config,
> > - sizeof(adapter->hwtstamp_config)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> > -}
> > + *kernel_config = adapter->hwtstamp_config;
> >
> > -static int e1000_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd)
> > -{
> > - switch (cmd) {
> > - case SIOCGMIIPHY:
> > - case SIOCGMIIREG:
> > - case SIOCSMIIREG:
> > - return e1000_mii_ioctl(netdev, ifr, cmd);
> > - case SIOCSHWTSTAMP:
> > - return e1000e_hwtstamp_set(netdev, ifr);
> > - case SIOCGHWTSTAMP:
> > - return e1000e_hwtstamp_get(netdev, ifr);
> > - default:
> > - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > - }
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static int e1000_init_phy_wakeup(struct e1000_adapter *adapter, u32 wufc)
> > @@ -7346,9 +7336,11 @@ static const struct net_device_ops e1000e_netdev_ops = {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
> > .ndo_poll_controller = e1000_netpoll,
> > #endif
> > - .ndo_set_features = e1000_set_features,
> > - .ndo_fix_features = e1000_fix_features,
> > + .ndo_set_features = e1000_set_features,
> > + .ndo_fix_features = e1000_fix_features,
> > .ndo_features_check = passthru_features_check,
> > + .ndo_hwtstamp_get = e1000e_hwtstamp_get,
> > + .ndo_hwtstamp_set = e1000e_hwtstamp_set,
> > };
> >
> > /**
> >
>
>
> Also you are missing a subject prefix, I assume that you mean to send it
> to iwl-next since it is not a bug fix. Please add it to your patch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-02-12 22:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-02-08 15:43 [PATCH v2] net: e1000e: convert to ndo_hwtstamp_get() and ndo_hwtstamp_set() Piotr Wejman
2025-02-10 9:13 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2025-02-10 14:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-12 14:07 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Lifshits, Vitaly
2025-02-12 22:32 ` Piotr Wejman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).