From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Andrew Grover" Subject: Re: I/OAT: Call for discussion Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 21:12:34 -0700 Message-ID: References: <5389061B65D50446B1783B97DFDB392D8E9F0A@orsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com> <200604200249.03167.ak@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: "Grover, Andrew" , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from xproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.82.206]:23273 "EHLO xproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751254AbWDTEMe convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2006 00:12:34 -0400 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t10so51718wxc for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 21:12:34 -0700 (PDT) To: "Andi Kleen" In-Reply-To: <200604200249.03167.ak@suse.de> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 4/19/06, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Wednesday 19 April 2006 18:39, Grover, Andrew wrote: > > > We have posted all the performance data we have gathered so far on the > > linux-net wiki: http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/I/OAT , and listed > > the overall concerns that have been expressed in private. I'm hoping you > > will look at the data, re-examine the patches, and then we can talk > > about the technical issues here on the list, getting down to the > > specifics, so we can hash it out in public and settle on the right path > > to take. > > Maybe it would be best if you just reposted the patches? OK, I can do that tomorrow. For now I put them on the wiki (see link above) -- Andy