From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Grover Subject: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 01/21] RDS: Socket interface Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:17:05 -0800 Message-ID: References: <1233022678-9259-1-git-send-email-andy.grover@oracle.com> <1233022678-9259-2-git-send-email-andy.grover@oracle.com> <20090126194619.02c9557e@extreme> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, rdreier@cisco.com, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com, general@lists.openfabrics.org To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090126194619.02c9557e@extreme> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org Errors-To: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> +/* this is just used for stats gathering :/ */ > > Then I would think a high speed protocol would use per-cpu > and/or rcu. For a spinlock guarding a socket list? I wouldn't think it would be worth the complexity. [other comments snipped, will fix per your advice, thanks!] Regards -- Andy