netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Grover <andy.grover@gmail.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: using huge numbers of queues
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 14:59:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c0a09e5c0910071459r2768f420lae87f7404dfbc054@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hi Herbert,

At NetConf, you made a passing remark about wanting lots of queues,
even 1-per-socket. Have you thought further about how we would use so
many?

Thinking about this reminded me of VJ's 2006 netchannel concept, which
although not adopted, was pretty interesting. Would having 1 queue per
socket (or at least 1 per process) and hw that is able to filter
individual flows (I think the Intel 82599 can do this now for up to
128) perhaps make netchannels workable? At least this would get all
processing out of int/bh and into process context, if not userspace,
no?

Regards -- Andy

             reply	other threads:[~2009-10-07 22:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-07 21:59 Andrew Grover [this message]
2009-10-07 22:38 ` using huge numbers of queues David Miller
2009-10-08 19:56   ` Mark Smith
2009-10-07 23:22 ` Ben Hutchings
2009-10-09  1:02 ` Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c0a09e5c0910071459r2768f420lae87f7404dfbc054@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=andy.grover@gmail.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).