From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=95.215.58.147 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792552067; b=I2mogzWY3oYNrw+lx5tghivMBuCskfK67wyoClZEfWQbomC+p/Or4J/lGml/p8qtbZ2/ 0ob1ybNSiXNMYDwPgGRRBjAodf5nISwAbbCaXaiIkjLv1CO8Ri/pkNPBYlRaA81GoX4cB I0bWxMkGhqB8PoL/ybpuw/nk3VxrJyiKlbiBKzs6c9NkG//iqjpch7rxsBt47eATFm6YB 7A514ge2LTlvZcpx3MHdRni8fJTzAw4EtR96p8Q39G90NWpOA05tEqyOmtvrLKrBRLRbW mu4pOv+dm76A7RtC/XBfEpF4BsmQ1dIL1WIp9y/X4BeNbEMs9Ik/B5BFrJPiGJvcIXA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792552067; h=DMARC-Filter:X-Envelope-To:DKIM-Signature:X-Envelope-To:Received: X-Mizu-Trace-ID:X-Migadu-Flow:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:User-Agent: Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=LXGO/Ihk9N7F64gTwFfu4H1jjMd/4KNmHzrx69idA3c=; b=K2a/xNTlUjLgMrC37vY64UX2Klxh3p0E8TsqmXHKPenbMRkMXIGMsr7kvmYtCPGI5uZg hVODYRINhGCAZX6ehnc+kPEf82tmdj6OJY4khAPdoSozcCEGeIMuqLGqDeq7vuRfCCdys frHV3AAfXg6EYBnYGIJrzsRd2BlMrZEHbb65gJ/04L/JuygY+82stq765vqhJEw/I898L Jc5ygn/DjYzrmHxPGAtDASDiU8UXOLDgO1ys4S7bucnQNE8r+b79/fd1G9jW1GkLNMGs4 B0/Tm1ILfQOp7DExBREzEPTcrZd/Dy0CEEMZI6VSh2cDxytS5dsDBhj3Kd7MSkpvFVQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=95.215.58.147 Received: from mta1.migadu.com (out-147.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.147]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DAE6606A31B for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 03:07:35 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 7DAE6606A31B Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev X-Envelope-To: netdev@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=/uplozhpt4dcAKvCO16vQWyHQ5FbixVEQFL8xKVM96I=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1792552054; v=1; x=1793156854; b=M8yYgPPoV4q7547aFDcoivPGdL1St8RTKNnolZ0Hene2Htbbwwjd1qDW7l0viyLmAJiFgLp0 B5rhbkXporg8LeRtmzNXGaTAoM88ogE9KduOGiZNbuRm+t59Y81kmap3BT+J65CfY8humsmfr+b HkHdD57pIHvF5ZiJRTpwN3eM= X-Envelope-To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Received: by smtp.migadu.com with ESMTPS id eed8bf568db21181; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 03:07:34 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: eed8bf568db21181 X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 11:07:27 +0800 X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ppp: linearize bridged packets when required To: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Breno Leitao , Kees Cook , Taegu Ha , Tom Parkin , linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Chapman , Sashiko References: <20261021023608.55867-1-qingfang.deng@linux.dev> <179255036282.3290.8488375760281728576@kernel.org> From: Qingfang Deng In-Reply-To: <179255036282.3290.8488375760281728576@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2026/10/21 10:39, netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org wrote: > Hi! > > This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its > commit messages seem to be missing some information: > > - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical > (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include > the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. This is reproduced in a VM, with a TAP interface bridged to a PTY. When IFF_NAPI_FRAGS is set, a non-linear skb is passed to PPPoE and then to ppp_async_send() without linearization. The packet sent to the PTY then contains garbage data. > > Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, > reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers > can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for > other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages > then. > > The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think > that is the case please reply and explain.