From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: honor eee_disabled_modes in phy_support_eee()
Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 16:40:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c18fa685-0ff6-4783-a26e-aa375df1ed71@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260516-devel-phy-support-eee-fix-v1-1-59debc00eda0@tipi-net.de>
On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 06:51:02AM +0200, Nicolai Buchwitz wrote:
> phy_support_eee() copies supported_eee into advertising_eee
> unconditionally, overwriting any filtering applied during phy_probe()
> based on DT eee-broken-* properties or driver-populated
> eee_disabled_modes. MAC drivers that call phy_support_eee() after
> probe (e.g. bcmgenet, fec, lan743x, lan78xx, r8169) then cause the PHY
> to advertise EEE for modes the user marked as broken.
>
> The symptom is that ethtool --show-eee on the local interface reports
> "not supported" (supported & ~eee_disabled_modes is empty) while the
> link partner sees EEE negotiated and active.
>
> phy_probe() already filters advertising_eee via eee_disabled_modes
> after calling of_set_phy_eee_broken(). Apply the same mask in
> phy_support_eee() so the filtering survives the copy.
I don't think this not the full fix.
of_set_phy_eee_broken() sets phydev->eee_disabled_modes.
genphy_c45_ethtool_get_eee() masks supported_eee with this when
reporting to user space what is supported.
genphy_c45_ethtool_set_eee() will also mask what user space passes in,
if it is not empty. However, if nothing is passed in,
phy_advertise_eee_all() is used, and that does not make use of
phydev->eee_disabled_modes, which i think it should.
So while your fix seems correct, i don't think on its own, it is
sufficient. Whenever phydev->supported_eee is used, we need to review
the code and see if it should be masked by phydev->eee_disabled_modes.
Andrew
---
pw-bot: cr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-16 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-16 4:51 [PATCH] net: phy: honor eee_disabled_modes in phy_support_eee() Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-05-16 5:21 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-05-16 14:40 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c18fa685-0ff6-4783-a26e-aa375df1ed71@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=nb@tipi-net.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox