From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 622A7C76195 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 10:37:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233705AbjC0Khv (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Mar 2023 06:37:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51768 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233700AbjC0Khh (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Mar 2023 06:37:37 -0400 Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-mw2nam10on2082.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.94.82]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DB332D40 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 03:37:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Zx9qLq4yzddm2xDUcdw+rRP4oQxuW3bzVwzA9jIirzDxuT8p+SB+StpWW8hC4s8hhw7ItL9kl2j7k+dAsGJrwOgAnD1Ckju/7+3ZqIAI4fcwdqvcTI4vWNK/RxW4walLTTrwrpUcqREiVEfUCbj034hnTroM/JgZb2QcrU5HbtP/khrGyHS9VQdDb4E/UBvhfhPOnUGCpPfKILZsN13cnWeIC7ZoiX3ppqJJ13nz7iXu5L+HdIBxXyD4rlcAfoyYinqOHhFJTdvaK20OnhGHSS6lZShhJod07HdtyK898Hb185e/LbTDDQP0/TODx+PH2/4lwbTxtW94rOwMc7TZxg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=gcIU5H8xwkCHZ9FJTLBGeqw0Os4Ij7183W6nsZOlvQ8=; b=CF8RTtc53SX5uSzNrmXBiwNORusTira4q7enI1FHiFxB00xJe8KePjlWOeeFOTn41CnTk1cq0krLTcyA7mncTADPNxcPF/YlBSaQiWUc7sT0oEU7+a127pS27xhAjnZeLkIi+N4GoFNiMM2bjoEq+o0qRKT9OFd035uYKOBvLjdbZsxAcVedntXa8unC3qciEaYZVZn4P2t7Ru3DVKaKzDA7DPJHhvSL60pPMF5WHABvf3rDWJUJYBU9U+pGbnAc0A6R+qkM7k9GpwmOEXyN/U02bM4HlTiVwT3U5uZxzW5Lz+zxC89BCEapqBIzn9Y2MuBVpSjuqVG0w0oFEMBHZQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 165.204.84.17) smtp.rcpttodomain=davemloft.net smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine sp=quarantine pct=100) action=none header.from=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amd.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=gcIU5H8xwkCHZ9FJTLBGeqw0Os4Ij7183W6nsZOlvQ8=; b=lXT5NKthhZB3U/glmCDYYpmTgRnMTQwe2NvAJ7oPAibOSylcKFWCflf5Wtp+VTea03kDpv/4spKQtuvFr2IVwOMSAStGj4pwU50WdAPt1YbN/oFUN2WkQ/kPlnpjWo/TdLYOItB89Ev6ioaSvkr/THTf5fP5SRJt4rDkr+NZ1eQ= Received: from BN9PR03CA0448.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:113::33) by PH7PR12MB6396.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:1fc::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.6222.30; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 10:37:26 +0000 Received: from BN8NAM11FT086.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:113:cafe::cf) by BN9PR03CA0448.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:408:113::33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.6178.41 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 10:37:26 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 165.204.84.17) smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=amd.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of amd.com designates 165.204.84.17 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=165.204.84.17; helo=SATLEXMB04.amd.com; pr=C Received: from SATLEXMB04.amd.com (165.204.84.17) by BN8NAM11FT086.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.176.220) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.20.6222.17 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 10:37:25 +0000 Received: from SATLEXMB06.amd.com (10.181.40.147) by SATLEXMB04.amd.com (10.181.40.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.34; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 05:37:17 -0500 Received: from SATLEXMB03.amd.com (10.181.40.144) by SATLEXMB06.amd.com (10.181.40.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.34; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 05:37:16 -0500 Received: from xcbecree41x.xilinx.com (10.180.168.240) by SATLEXMB03.amd.com (10.181.40.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.34 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 05:37:15 -0500 From: To: , , , , CC: Edward Cree , , , , Subject: [PATCH net-next v3 5/6] sfc: add code to register and unregister encap matches Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 11:36:07 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: BN8NAM11FT086:EE_|PH7PR12MB6396:EE_ X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 926212a4-6adb-4315-adb8-08db2eaf41b7 X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: Tv1YHSQFUO/GeQVtkCnq/MAphNXT8wXVto7WiUG34kS5pFJVw4jIRVCQr5YOVq6WFfb6BN9NFXCM/UGz9QdERWLK2U7qEyoNgh1ep803JTcEs1ojln7E6XUxgL3wg6ZSpPtc3K20I/9QX6XY3BU4V+TlyxQZZ7ssK0VAIYA95oRabYCTDnQgZPOLPoDB5TKHBjcKI9jGPQuCzDxUwdkeO1VOk32yY+V8YmSq0XKRO6W3gkh2ZUQddXof4Wd7990q2zs75mnC4X+mLiM5kVWF+Ce+pRn/Z+Qhu4SOivi03LyE0B1E4FI89AIFQNyMixW5EYdiKZuBlPYJnDYr+3wFX6sIuwNNgPJFJxMbkjpyPJ92GI2YK/ls8JMTfJ+MD7T0mZd3Hb2Dyli99L+YO1u/fQCzpD99VfE6/co8q1iGp3XGC3MPPs8JJDn8avQpF/Zv0IuoXESxP9b4H7f5Bd1B6zWrgBOH/FKfeTtevMWVf9lw5CQAbdWEPJ7xX4rVC0T9Q7ACx7SVqUSwMnDZ8AiP43acd13aeK1tmhPmQ6/vhDx6Sel6VEwCZ8U1m2bIlUfyAGSNs74GVHu510E9T2jd5kuF8k9cR6yFq6Az+f5Y47wKkraGcyVDa3nNZifHPE88S5efdxYNGQEu+nBeVLOy9fDcG8bc6d4gfxbb76f4733E/PGPpmYMI/tM5M1v/Cm0w9rK9IJccBLMymTDFU9nXmSVq7sjpnFo5WdB94CILxnZQJG3ZR0ouqBXncIqaglfwHtaTdZulJbjsDVTTcOhSA== X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:165.204.84.17;CTRY:US;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:CAL;SFV:NSPM;H:SATLEXMB04.amd.com;PTR:InfoDomainNonexistent;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230028)(4636009)(376002)(396003)(346002)(136003)(39860400002)(451199021)(46966006)(40470700004)(36840700001)(110136005)(316002)(40460700003)(36860700001)(54906003)(478600001)(356005)(81166007)(82740400003)(8936002)(5660300002)(36756003)(55446002)(86362001)(82310400005)(2906002)(2876002)(4326008)(8676002)(70206006)(70586007)(41300700001)(40480700001)(6666004)(186003)(9686003)(26005)(426003)(336012)(43170500006)(83380400001)(47076005)(36900700001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: amd.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Mar 2023 10:37:25.9299 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 926212a4-6adb-4315-adb8-08db2eaf41b7 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d;Ip=[165.204.84.17];Helo=[SATLEXMB04.amd.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN8NAM11FT086.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PH7PR12MB6396 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org From: Edward Cree Add a hashtable to detect duplicate and conflicting matches. If match is not a duplicate, call MAE functions to add/remove it from OR table. Calling code not added yet, so mark the new functions as unused. Signed-off-by: Edward Cree --- Changed in v3: initialise `ipv6` variable (Jakub, kernel test robot) Changed in v2: replace `unsigned char ipv` with `bool ipv6`, simplifying code (suggested by Michal) --- drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.h | 11 +++ 2 files changed, 174 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c index 21eb79b20978..69d3ee5d23d1 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c @@ -57,6 +57,12 @@ static s64 efx_tc_flower_external_mport(struct efx_nic *efx, struct efx_rep *efv return mport; } +static const struct rhashtable_params efx_tc_encap_match_ht_params = { + .key_len = offsetof(struct efx_tc_encap_match, linkage), + .key_offset = 0, + .head_offset = offsetof(struct efx_tc_encap_match, linkage), +}; + static const struct rhashtable_params efx_tc_match_action_ht_params = { .key_len = sizeof(unsigned long), .key_offset = offsetof(struct efx_tc_flow_rule, cookie), @@ -340,6 +346,144 @@ static int efx_tc_flower_parse_match(struct efx_nic *efx, return 0; } +__always_unused +static int efx_tc_flower_record_encap_match(struct efx_nic *efx, + struct efx_tc_match *match, + enum efx_encap_type type, + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) +{ + struct efx_tc_encap_match *encap, *old; + bool ipv6 = false; + int rc; + + /* We require that the socket-defining fields (IP addrs and UDP dest + * port) are present and exact-match. Other fields are currently not + * allowed. This meets what OVS will ask for, and means that we don't + * need to handle difficult checks for overlapping matches as could + * come up if we allowed masks or varying sets of match fields. + */ + if (match->mask.enc_dst_ip | match->mask.enc_src_ip) { + if (!IS_ALL_ONES(match->mask.enc_dst_ip)) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, + "Egress encap match is not exact on dst IP address"); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + if (!IS_ALL_ONES(match->mask.enc_src_ip)) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, + "Egress encap match is not exact on src IP address"); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } +#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6 + if (!ipv6_addr_any(&match->mask.enc_dst_ip6) || + !ipv6_addr_any(&match->mask.enc_src_ip6)) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, + "Egress encap match on both IPv4 and IPv6, don't understand"); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + } else { + ipv6 = true; + if (!efx_ipv6_addr_all_ones(&match->mask.enc_dst_ip6)) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, + "Egress encap match is not exact on dst IP address"); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + if (!efx_ipv6_addr_all_ones(&match->mask.enc_src_ip6)) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, + "Egress encap match is not exact on src IP address"); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } +#endif + } + if (!IS_ALL_ONES(match->mask.enc_dport)) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Egress encap match is not exact on dst UDP port"); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + if (match->mask.enc_sport) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Egress encap match on src UDP port not supported"); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + if (match->mask.enc_ip_tos) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Egress encap match on IP ToS not supported"); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + if (match->mask.enc_ip_ttl) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Egress encap match on IP TTL not supported"); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + + rc = efx_mae_check_encap_match_caps(efx, ipv6, extack); + if (rc) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack, "MAE hw reports no support for IPv%d encap matches", + ipv6 ? 6 : 4); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + + encap = kzalloc(sizeof(*encap), GFP_USER); + if (!encap) + return -ENOMEM; + encap->src_ip = match->value.enc_src_ip; + encap->dst_ip = match->value.enc_dst_ip; +#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6 + encap->src_ip6 = match->value.enc_src_ip6; + encap->dst_ip6 = match->value.enc_dst_ip6; +#endif + encap->udp_dport = match->value.enc_dport; + encap->tun_type = type; + old = rhashtable_lookup_get_insert_fast(&efx->tc->encap_match_ht, + &encap->linkage, + efx_tc_encap_match_ht_params); + if (old) { + /* don't need our new entry */ + kfree(encap); + if (old->tun_type != type) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack, + "Egress encap match with conflicting tun_type %u != %u", + old->tun_type, type); + return -EEXIST; + } + if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&old->ref)) + return -EAGAIN; + /* existing entry found */ + encap = old; + } else { + rc = efx_mae_register_encap_match(efx, encap); + if (rc) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed to record egress encap match in HW"); + goto fail; + } + refcount_set(&encap->ref, 1); + } + match->encap = encap; + return 0; +fail: + rhashtable_remove_fast(&efx->tc->encap_match_ht, &encap->linkage, + efx_tc_encap_match_ht_params); + kfree(encap); + return rc; +} + +__always_unused +static void efx_tc_flower_release_encap_match(struct efx_nic *efx, + struct efx_tc_encap_match *encap) +{ + int rc; + + if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&encap->ref)) + return; /* still in use */ + + rc = efx_mae_unregister_encap_match(efx, encap); + if (rc) + /* Display message but carry on and remove entry from our + * SW tables, because there's not much we can do about it. + */ + netif_err(efx, drv, efx->net_dev, + "Failed to release encap match %#x, rc %d\n", + encap->fw_id, rc); + rhashtable_remove_fast(&efx->tc->encap_match_ht, &encap->linkage, + efx_tc_encap_match_ht_params); + kfree(encap); +} + /* For details of action order constraints refer to SF-123102-TC-1ยง12.6.1 */ enum efx_tc_action_order { EFX_TC_AO_VLAN_POP, @@ -974,6 +1118,18 @@ void efx_fini_tc(struct efx_nic *efx) efx->tc->up = false; } +/* At teardown time, all TC filter rules (and thus all resources they created) + * should already have been removed. If we find any in our hashtables, make a + * cursory attempt to clean up the software side. + */ +static void efx_tc_encap_match_free(void *ptr, void *__unused) +{ + struct efx_tc_encap_match *encap = ptr; + + WARN_ON(refcount_read(&encap->ref)); + kfree(encap); +} + int efx_init_struct_tc(struct efx_nic *efx) { int rc; @@ -996,6 +1152,9 @@ int efx_init_struct_tc(struct efx_nic *efx) rc = efx_tc_init_counters(efx); if (rc < 0) goto fail_counters; + rc = rhashtable_init(&efx->tc->encap_match_ht, &efx_tc_encap_match_ht_params); + if (rc < 0) + goto fail_encap_match_ht; rc = rhashtable_init(&efx->tc->match_action_ht, &efx_tc_match_action_ht_params); if (rc < 0) goto fail_match_action_ht; @@ -1008,6 +1167,8 @@ int efx_init_struct_tc(struct efx_nic *efx) efx->extra_channel_type[EFX_EXTRA_CHANNEL_TC] = &efx_tc_channel_type; return 0; fail_match_action_ht: + rhashtable_destroy(&efx->tc->encap_match_ht); +fail_encap_match_ht: efx_tc_destroy_counters(efx); fail_counters: mutex_destroy(&efx->tc->mutex); @@ -1030,6 +1191,8 @@ void efx_fini_struct_tc(struct efx_nic *efx) MC_CMD_MAE_ACTION_RULE_INSERT_OUT_ACTION_RULE_ID_NULL); rhashtable_free_and_destroy(&efx->tc->match_action_ht, efx_tc_flow_free, efx); + rhashtable_free_and_destroy(&efx->tc->encap_match_ht, + efx_tc_encap_match_free, NULL); efx_tc_fini_counters(efx); mutex_unlock(&efx->tc->mutex); mutex_destroy(&efx->tc->mutex); diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.h index fff73960698a..7d06c5031b56 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.h +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.h @@ -18,6 +18,13 @@ #define IS_ALL_ONES(v) (!(typeof (v))~(v)) +#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6 +static inline bool efx_ipv6_addr_all_ones(struct in6_addr *addr) +{ + return !memchr_inv(addr, 0xff, sizeof(*addr)); +} +#endif + struct efx_tc_action_set { u16 vlan_push:2; u16 vlan_pop:2; @@ -70,7 +77,9 @@ struct efx_tc_encap_match { __be32 src_ip, dst_ip; struct in6_addr src_ip6, dst_ip6; __be16 udp_dport; + struct rhash_head linkage; enum efx_encap_type tun_type; + refcount_t ref; u32 fw_id; /* index of this entry in firmware encap match table */ }; @@ -107,6 +116,7 @@ enum efx_tc_rule_prios { * @mutex: Used to serialise operations on TC hashtables * @counter_ht: Hashtable of TC counters (FW IDs and counter values) * @counter_id_ht: Hashtable mapping TC counter cookies to counters + * @encap_match_ht: Hashtable of TC encap matches * @match_action_ht: Hashtable of TC match-action rules * @reps_mport_id: MAE port allocated for representor RX * @reps_filter_uc: VNIC filter for representor unicast RX (promisc) @@ -130,6 +140,7 @@ struct efx_tc_state { struct mutex mutex; struct rhashtable counter_ht; struct rhashtable counter_id_ht; + struct rhashtable encap_match_ht; struct rhashtable match_action_ht; u32 reps_mport_id, reps_mport_vport_id; s32 reps_filter_uc, reps_filter_mc;