From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA6E9A0; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 03:09:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.252]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4SqG8R64l7zWjbg; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 19:09:11 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemm000007.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.193.23.189]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75C451800D0; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 19:09:19 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.120.192] (10.67.120.192) by kwepemm000007.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.189) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 19:09:18 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 19:09:17 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird CC: , , , , , , , , , , , Andrew Lunn , Ido Schimmel Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/6] net: hns3: Add support for some CMIS transceiver modules To: Jakub Kicinski References: <20231211020816.69434-1-shaojijie@huawei.com> <20231211020816.69434-6-shaojijie@huawei.com> <20231211192122.14da98f0@kernel.org> From: Jijie Shao In-Reply-To: <20231211192122.14da98f0@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To kwepemm000007.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.189) on 2023/12/12 11:21, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 10:08:15 +0800 Jijie Shao wrote: >> Add two more SFF-8024 Identifier Values that according to the standard >> support the Common Management Interface Specification (CMIS) memory map >> so the hns3 driver will be able to dump, parse and print their EEPROM >> contents.This two SFF-8024 Identifier Values are SFF8024_ID_QSFP_DD (0x18) >> and SFF8024_ID_QSFP_PLUS_CMIS (0x1E). > Hm, you don't implement the ethtool get_module_eeprom_by_page op? > I thought for QSFP DD page support was basically required. Yeah, the ethtool op was ignored. And it will be added in v2.