From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/9] net: lwtunnel: Add extack to encap attr validation
Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 20:44:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c2dabec6-073d-923e-263e-e029fcb23f97@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201705280846.ceaILiWY%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
On 5/27/17 7:02 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> [auto build test ERROR on net-next/master]
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/David-Ahern/net-another-round-of-extack-handling-for-routing/20170528-062659
> config: ia64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 6.2.0
> reproduce:
> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/01org/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make.cross ARCH=ia64
>
> Note: the linux-review/David-Ahern/net-another-round-of-extack-handling-for-routing/20170528-062659 HEAD 44d11f94ccbe86e1a088f83a49ef3ca473118ad8 builds fine.
> It only hurts bisectibility.
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> ERROR: "ia64_delay_loop" [drivers/spi/spi-thunderx.ko] undefined!
>>> ERROR: "ia64_delay_loop" [drivers/net/phy/mdio-cavium.ko] undefined!
Appears to be a false positive. I do not modify anything related to
delay loops and none of this code is arch specific.
kbuild guys: can you clarify?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-28 2:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-27 22:19 [PATCH v2 net-next 0/9] net: another round of extack handling for routing David Ahern
2017-05-27 22:19 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/9] net: ipv4: refactor key and length checks David Ahern
2017-05-27 22:19 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 2/9] net: ipv4: Add extack message for invalid prefix or length David Ahern
2017-05-27 22:19 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 3/9] net: lwtunnel: Add extack to encap attr validation David Ahern
2017-05-28 1:02 ` kbuild test robot
2017-05-28 2:44 ` David Ahern [this message]
2017-05-27 22:19 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 4/9] net: add extack arg to lwtunnel build state David Ahern
2017-05-27 22:19 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 5/9] net: Fill in extack for mpls lwt encap David Ahern
2017-05-27 22:19 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 6/9] net: mpls: Pull common label check into helper David Ahern
2017-05-27 22:19 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 7/9] net: mpls: Add extack messages for route add and delete failures David Ahern
2017-05-27 22:19 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 8/9] net: mpls: Make nla_get_via in af_mpls.c David Ahern
2017-05-27 22:19 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 9/9] net: mpls: remove unnecessary initialization of err David Ahern
2017-05-30 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 0/9] net: another round of extack handling for routing David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c2dabec6-073d-923e-263e-e029fcb23f97@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).