public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	davem@davemloft.net, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: qcom: at803x: Use the correct bit to disable extended next page
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2026 18:54:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c37f182e-cbb4-4f0b-817a-759d39940212@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4b386a4a-9743-4e79-8d3d-3576bb9de492@lunn.ch>

Hi Andrew,

On 11/04/2026 16:10, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 07:10:20PM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
>> As noted in the blamed commit, the AR8035 and other PHYs from this
>> family advertise the Extended Next Page support by default, which may be
>> understood by some partners as this PHY being multi-gig capable.
>>
>> The fix is to disable XNP advertising, which is done by setting bit 12
>> of the Auto-Negotiation Advertisement Register (MII_ADVERTISE).
>>
>> The blamed commit incorrectly uses MDIO_AN_CTRL1_XNP, which is bit 13 as per
>> 802.3 : 45.2.7.1 AN control register (Register 7.0)
>>
>> BIT 12 in MII_ADVERTISE is wrapped by ADVERTISE_RESV, used by some
>> drivers such as the aquantia one. 802.3 Clause 28 defines bit 12 as
>> Extended Next Page ability, at least in recent versions of the standard.
> 
>> Let's add a define for it and use it in the at803x driver.
> 
> I agree with this, it defines the C22 4.12 bit. And this is what the
> at803x driver is using it for.
> 
>>  static void at803x_link_change_notify(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/mii.h b/include/uapi/linux/mii.h
>> index 39f7c44baf53..61d6edad4b94 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/mii.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/mii.h
>> @@ -82,7 +82,8 @@
>>  #define ADVERTISE_100BASE4	0x0200	/* Try for 100mbps 4k packets  */
>>  #define ADVERTISE_PAUSE_CAP	0x0400	/* Try for pause               */
>>  #define ADVERTISE_PAUSE_ASYM	0x0800	/* Try for asymetric pause     */
>> -#define ADVERTISE_RESV		0x1000	/* Unused...                   */
>> +#define ADVERTISE_XNP		0x1000  /* Extended Next Page */
>> +#define ADVERTISE_RESV		ADVERTISE_XNP /* Used to be reserved */
> 
> Should we keep ADVERTISE_RESV?
> 
>   45.2.7.6 AN advertisement register
> 
>   If the Auto-Negotiation advertisement register (register 4) is
>   present, (see 28.2.4.1.3), then this register is a copy of the
>   Auto-Negotiation advertisement register (register 4). In this case,
>   reads to the AN advertisement register (7.16) report the value of
>   the Auto-Negotiation advertisement register (register 4); writes to
>   the AN advertisement register (7.16) cause a write to occur to the
>   Auto-Negotiation advertisement register.
> 
> So MDIO_MMD_AN:MDIO_AN_ADVERTISE is a straight copy of MII_ADVERTISE.
> 
>         ef4_mdio_write(efx, MDIO_MMD_AN, MDIO_AN_ADVERTISE, reg);
>         ret = phy_write_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_AN, MDIO_AN_ADVERTISE, adv);
> 
> So ADVERTISE_XNP is just as valid in the other two drivers using
> ADVERTISE_RESV. I think we should change those as well to
> ADVERTISE_XNP and remove ADVERTISE_RESV?
> 
> 	Andrew

I agree with that yes and I've considered converting these drivers once
we have net merged into net-next should this patch be applied :)

That said, ADVERTISE_RESV is in uapi, is it even possible to remove it ?

I think the best we can hope for is to no longer have in-tree users of
ADVERTISE_RESV :(

Maxime


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-11 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-10 17:10 [PATCH net] net: phy: qcom: at803x: Use the correct bit to disable extended next page Maxime Chevallier
2026-04-11 14:10 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-04-11 16:54   ` Maxime Chevallier [this message]
2026-04-11 20:49     ` Andrew Lunn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c37f182e-cbb4-4f0b-817a-759d39940212@bootlin.com \
    --to=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox