From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559C2C282C0 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 19:35:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F2E218A6 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 19:35:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728632AbfAYTfC (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jan 2019 14:35:02 -0500 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.62]:37378 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726165AbfAYTfC (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jan 2019 14:35:02 -0500 Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92-RC4) (envelope-from ) id 1gn7Fj-0003GU-9h; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 20:34:59 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] netlink: reduce NLA_POLICY_NESTED{,_ARRAY} arguments From: Johannes Berg To: David Miller Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 20:34:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20190125.110403.1859522316620338548.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20190125090828.26361-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net> <20190125.110403.1859522316620338548.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-2.fc28) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2019-01-25 at 11:04 -0800, David Miller wrote: > > > Dave, it looks like we're the only users of this right now, > > so let me know if you'd prefer I take it through my tree. > > Also, this conflicts with the fix I just made to the place > > where I got it wrong, but obviously the resolution is to > > just take the version without the maxattr argument. > > Please take it through your tree in that case. It'll probably > be the more painless way to merge this. Will do. The most painless would be if you'd merge net into net-next, then I could pull net-next into mac80211-next and resolve the conflict before I even apply the patch. In fact, I think either way I'll just wait until you do that, I suppose you will eventually anyway? johannes