From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: "Daniel T. Lee" <danieltimlee@gmail.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] samples: bpf: fix bpf programs with kprobe/sys_connect event
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 22:12:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4061b5f-b42e-4ecc-e3fb-7a70206da417@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200702021646.90347-2-danieltimlee@gmail.com>
On 7/1/20 7:16 PM, Daniel T. Lee wrote:
> Currently, BPF programs with kprobe/sys_connect does not work properly.
>
> Commit 34745aed515c ("samples/bpf: fix kprobe attachment issue on x64")
> This commit modifies the bpf_load behavior of kprobe events in the x64
> architecture. If the current kprobe event target starts with "sys_*",
> add the prefix "__x64_" to the front of the event.
>
> Appending "__x64_" prefix with kprobe/sys_* event was appropriate as a
> solution to most of the problems caused by the commit below.
>
> commit d5a00528b58c ("syscalls/core, syscalls/x86: Rename struct
> pt_regs-based sys_*() to __x64_sys_*()")
>
> However, there is a problem with the sys_connect kprobe event that does
> not work properly. For __sys_connect event, parameters can be fetched
> normally, but for __x64_sys_connect, parameters cannot be fetched.
>
> Because of this problem, this commit fixes the sys_connect event by
> specifying the __sys_connect directly and this will bypass the
> "__x64_" appending rule of bpf_load.
In the kernel code, we have
SYSCALL_DEFINE3(connect, int, fd, struct sockaddr __user *, uservaddr,
int, addrlen)
{
return __sys_connect(fd, uservaddr, addrlen);
}
Depending on compiler, there is no guarantee that __sys_connect will
not be inlined. I would prefer to still use the entry point
__x64_sys_* e.g.,
SEC("kprobe/" SYSCALL(sys_write))
>
> Fixes: 34745aed515c ("samples/bpf: fix kprobe attachment issue on x64")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel T. Lee <danieltimlee@gmail.com>
> ---
> samples/bpf/map_perf_test_kern.c | 2 +-
> samples/bpf/test_map_in_map_kern.c | 2 +-
> samples/bpf/test_probe_write_user_kern.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/map_perf_test_kern.c b/samples/bpf/map_perf_test_kern.c
> index 12e91ae64d4d..cebe2098bb24 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/map_perf_test_kern.c
> +++ b/samples/bpf/map_perf_test_kern.c
> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ int stress_percpu_hmap_alloc(struct pt_regs *ctx)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -SEC("kprobe/sys_connect")
> +SEC("kprobe/__sys_connect")
> int stress_lru_hmap_alloc(struct pt_regs *ctx)
> {
> char fmt[] = "Failed at stress_lru_hmap_alloc. ret:%dn";
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/test_map_in_map_kern.c b/samples/bpf/test_map_in_map_kern.c
> index 6cee61e8ce9b..b1562ba2f025 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/test_map_in_map_kern.c
> +++ b/samples/bpf/test_map_in_map_kern.c
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static __always_inline int do_inline_hash_lookup(void *inner_map, u32 port)
> return result ? *result : -ENOENT;
> }
>
> -SEC("kprobe/sys_connect")
> +SEC("kprobe/__sys_connect")
> int trace_sys_connect(struct pt_regs *ctx)
> {
> struct sockaddr_in6 *in6;
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/test_probe_write_user_kern.c b/samples/bpf/test_probe_write_user_kern.c
> index 6579639a83b2..9b3c3918c37d 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/test_probe_write_user_kern.c
> +++ b/samples/bpf/test_probe_write_user_kern.c
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ struct {
> * This example sits on a syscall, and the syscall ABI is relatively stable
> * of course, across platforms, and over time, the ABI may change.
> */
> -SEC("kprobe/sys_connect")
> +SEC("kprobe/__sys_connect")
> int bpf_prog1(struct pt_regs *ctx)
> {
> struct sockaddr_in new_addr, orig_addr = {};
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-02 5:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-02 2:16 [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] samples: bpf: refactor BPF map test with libbpf Daniel T. Lee
2020-07-02 2:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] samples: bpf: fix bpf programs with kprobe/sys_connect event Daniel T. Lee
2020-07-02 5:12 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2020-07-02 11:13 ` Daniel T. Lee
2020-07-02 16:04 ` Yonghong Song
2020-07-06 10:26 ` Daniel T. Lee
2020-07-06 23:49 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-07 2:33 ` Daniel T. Lee
2020-07-07 5:15 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-07 5:46 ` Daniel T. Lee
2020-07-02 2:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] samples: bpf: refactor BPF map in map test with libbpf Daniel T. Lee
2020-07-02 4:25 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-02 9:58 ` Daniel T. Lee
2020-07-02 2:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] samples: bpf: refactor BPF map performance " Daniel T. Lee
2020-07-02 4:33 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-02 11:24 ` Daniel T. Lee
2020-07-06 23:27 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-02 2:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests: bpf: remove unused bpf_map_def_legacy struct Daniel T. Lee
2020-07-02 4:39 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c4061b5f-b42e-4ecc-e3fb-7a70206da417@fb.com \
--to=yhs@fb.com \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=danieltimlee@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).