From: Youssef Samir <youssef.abdulrahman@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
jeff.hugo@oss.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] net: qrtr: ns: Limit the total number of nodes
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 18:49:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4cb79ac-1f90-499d-98ed-94ec431d9368@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260409-qrtr-fix-v3-4-00a8a5ff2b51@oss.qualcomm.com>
On 4/9/2026 6:34 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Currently, the nameserver doesn't limit the number of nodes it handles.
> This can be an attack vector if a malicious client starts registering
> random nodes, leading to memory exhaustion.
>
> Hence, limit the maximum number of nodes to 64. Note that, limit of 64 is
> chosen based on the current platform requirements. If requirement changes
> in the future, this limit can be increased.
Hi Mani,
There are AI200 setups that can reach 384 nodes (192 * (AI200PF + AI200VF)).
I'm not sure about limiting the number of nodes, but if there's a use-case
that led to enforcing that limit, could we increase it to something like 512?
Thanks,
Youssef
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-09 17:34 [PATCH v3 0/5] net: qrtr: ns: A bunch of fixs Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-04-09 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] net: qrtr: ns: Limit the maximum server registration per node Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-04-09 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] net: qrtr: ns: Limit the maximum number of lookups Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-04-09 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] net: qrtr: ns: Free the node during ctrl_cmd_bye() Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-04-09 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] net: qrtr: ns: Limit the total number of nodes Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-08 17:49 ` Youssef Samir [this message]
2026-07-09 5:20 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-04-09 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] net: qrtr: ns: Fix use-after-free in driver remove() Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-04-13 22:40 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] net: qrtr: ns: A bunch of fixs patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c4cb79ac-1f90-499d-98ed-94ec431d9368@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=youssef.abdulrahman@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jeff.hugo@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox