From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Dichtel Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: set all.accept_dad to 0 by default Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 10:43:42 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20171113134536.15382-1-nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> <20171114032403.11ed517e@elisabeth> Reply-To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Matteo Croce , Erik Kline To: Stefano Brivio Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:33804 "EHLO mail-wm0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754176AbdKNJnn (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2017 04:43:43 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id n74so17195300wmi.1 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 01:43:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20171114032403.11ed517e@elisabeth> Content-Language: fr Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le 14/11/2017 à 03:24, Stefano Brivio a écrit : > On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:45:36 +0100 > Nicolas Dichtel wrote: > >> The commit a2d3f3e33853 modifies the way to disable dad on an interface. >> Before the patch, setting .accept_dad to 0 was enough to disable it. >> Because all.accept_dad is set to 1 by default, after the patch, the user >> needs to set both all.accept_dad and .accept_dad to 0 to disable it. > > Perhaps it would make sense to be a bit more descriptive here, this > seems to have generated quite some confusion. Yes, I agree. I will send a v2. Thank you, Nicolas