From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE7643E5597 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2026 08:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785140695; cv=none; b=Q+lnjpcdV0JnRMzVjBDe4v6mNX3o0Sap/wxOLNed8iBRHnh7V3r9b03FTCXxVoWTjj+Kl2zGCQwG+Prvagpi5iontyaaApbaVcCDmhGhZ57ZH98m0l3JWYGq2pKwPNcYGrOYHdF47Wkmq/OXtxK0yNAoFum7+XFkpKRJfrxfvuA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785140695; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1suIuveK1jVLK/3U/JiBvsxW+MzFeKYA+Y/R806QzeA=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Sg7/Bp1VfmYyawyMbFJ3OLF2TJFClud3Oh9wv5TN8XJOFGvr7ymGSdGR4B8zY78A3F/VyoLlyvMrMP7+SJV/HcxuK2C7BeT8OVa/OqUTmOOAhR2Wy2AWVISR0cVqsENJFvWuocg+J420pKlNb0rPcbblEWOrA52fG06bu/PAMcA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=OuRzedTT; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=Hmzk1r6V; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="OuRzedTT"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Hmzk1r6V" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1785140692; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MnXREwCAx/g7UNDirzlmChKeTeegmq5IfXqGd1tp0CQ=; b=OuRzedTTeAmvsIZXDaI/4LAIz0xAwGXYPpXVtSqgppqVABVs5uIXpHIiqhebe5F0cFkVB/ MgbXXDLXtq4Yn2pqd2G959LOL3qyD1bGQi4rjMS+Ce3jsgbwirR3NXepD2x0hHwJHAPdXu u6Hcz0CUrKGnGcjeRK69A20s5FeakpM= Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-198-WvejuA_KNvyHAY7SsNI0pw-1; Mon, 27 Jul 2026 04:24:51 -0400 X-MC-Unique: WvejuA_KNvyHAY7SsNI0pw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: WvejuA_KNvyHAY7SsNI0pw_1785140690 Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-49545071724so27260165e9.0 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2026 01:24:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=google; t=1785140690; x=1785745490; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=MnXREwCAx/g7UNDirzlmChKeTeegmq5IfXqGd1tp0CQ=; b=Hmzk1r6VRJrBqafLPzTSu6yuvZHbHNvZSD3ddQKuohMLubNiXwd1jNUy3b2/bJg2tq mnhO2oJowxvlxizV1sqyBE5DnxKO4m4NTP3LX+g+VoN57zpZZTkAendqGvDJPJABSHVM QKSb5Hf2AkUoPlELg8e2NfHpuXDvi5VSMlEyeymhw3bqzAHA/WAHZRMNr7HEVxhCHIGw 5E12eGBEBrQuO2s7vshjlc+Plx5Tc332G6QxFVKAuXWXed3V4ZDJ9qaOOLldfngQJI8J dTh6V0295a7bVeduG10zWLT50sGVWH45ve2vqB81t+n8UScR4vyz7IUC/P5pXYl18azE gGQA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1785140690; x=1785745490; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=MnXREwCAx/g7UNDirzlmChKeTeegmq5IfXqGd1tp0CQ=; b=RLgMsXzfZlVHdTMCYopgTAPxxd3fV4gyGa8bbM5npdnlTCdyPEW6+Fc2xpk6hdMnUV Iwijtf6NPYLhTD+0/9ZoZGm9cafpYES5opOXI+pSH0FZKYMNro9gqY6bZw2tTPhrqr3k hX22tH6TC861japGB7xcEemw+5kGVxuTkz2Iltm6NtAbMEwGKpdVRHECL6M7smSozrj5 mI2vWPT/aSiIxm+AAV5T//Qwc5AA6fYjMi9eou23ufWq3iM/R4lqxNVKqWNqOghAp9lv dWi/HDlIRSYBiKpUqgnCSf3C3ubrv+4rG1rVaAxYfYGCCUW3vzRv4FvE8TNj6lZvM2QY NL8w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz57gVLLeewqUf+Fp6qoo4qkhCjoWkct2zmUoZBeoaJy7bauNaF H9F3gyKpWAOMb6Uiv3UzWf8G2Ln1RnEj4WBW5UuDYxk5nIcnBCmhv80krVkA3OQ9ebpDXMQlM2C NVTnz6fWciLrCY3OXYomc+fTny6mUWkPw+zqNV0fovo6zto3Hqev+Lzqn6A== X-Gm-Gg: AR+sD10XF0Cs5oqDkMFcQHQKVGb/fLxIP25XswnocPbjv7kRtNQx6X+cG0wfAGISjyG UdJFwh5EFYMHb4yAP3PKwLdHTdlXC8zi/f1r3NwLCQY3GBx8yod/UYxUJnlRrVnToO+x6YGKtq5 63ky3QiV7w67tlM4jvIVMJoGMHBpKkeq233Bmzu5oD62mq/9t2cg4PBV7aPC63S8K4KQwmAud5G Zks+dCnOBTjpex9oT2xiK01Vc5fsF/yF2AIBcwFNmj8o0MDpGHj2r2hj72ko71fec2fGI5HwAnX WLks0Byt5NsknmU8i6z3a+0Z53Qfqxu/28ci1r9JHpiXFLLzav34A672qrPIhGW11WR9vENRRbZ gLNuWmu3LcbiPZKHxZSr+U1MNH7bw8k6ZqLzBPsTpBQb/ktGVYoN6TA3E1fiWsNCa8c2Evy7kbe 9kQg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:6d4e:b0:495:734e:4825 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-496b56fa45cmr66945645e9.16.1785140689986; Mon, 27 Jul 2026 01:24:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:6d4e:b0:495:734e:4825 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-496b56fa45cmr66945465e9.16.1785140689581; Mon, 27 Jul 2026 01:24:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2a0d:3344:5521:6b10:58fd:68f:7756:389d? ([2a0d:3344:5521:6b10:58fd:68f:7756:389d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-496b499ccb4sm213193705e9.10.2026.07.27.01.24.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Jul 2026 01:24:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 10:24:47 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] docs: netdev: clarify expected interactions with LLMs To: Matthieu Baerts , Jakub Raczynski Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Simon Horman , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan References: <83360de7addb13a3b5f4d5e722148f248fdb2ae0.1784884817.git.pabeni@redhat.com> <68b50e02-c238-48c6-b2aa-98eb21077329@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Paolo Abeni In-Reply-To: <68b50e02-c238-48c6-b2aa-98eb21077329@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 7/24/26 3:39 PM, Matthieu Baerts wrote: > Hi Paolo, Jakub, > > On 24/07/2026 13:56, Jakub Raczynski wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 11:24:05AM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote: >>> +both use the Sashiko infrastructure on top of different models. Reviews are >>> +available after 24h. Patch authors are expected to proactively look into the >>> +AI-generated reviews and handle such feedback as any other kind of review: >>> +either debate it or address it. In both cases a reply on the mailing list is >>> +expected. >>> + >> >> Would it be reasonable to implement automatic response from Sashiko to >> mailing list? Some mailing lists (eg. dri-devel as far as I have seen) post >> all replies from Sashiko to thread, which is imo not bad, >> although it could be filtered by High/Critical severity. >> >> What do you think about potential for similar solution on netdev, >> since AI review has become 'basic' check in patchwork? > I was thinking that too: it would be easier to reply to the comments, > and help the authors to remember about them. That will not help to > decrease the traffic on the netdev ML, but it is also possible to > configure Sashiko to email only the authors: > > https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/blob/main/docs/configuration.md#email_policytoml One concern I personally have with the above is that it could turn the ML in an public automated AI review tool, definitely flooding any eventual good contents. In any case this discussion is IMHO quite orthogonal to the documentation update. >>> +Authors are strongly encouraged to run LLM reviews on the posted patches in >>> +advance of the actual post. Large series triggering a significant amount of >>> +AI-generated feedback will likely get little attention from maintainers and >>> +reviewers. > > If Sashiko emails the list and/or the authors, it would be good if this > note is added to the emails, not to push people to abuse the public CI > and AI resources. > > On a similar topic, it might be interesting to mention SUIE and the > scoring system. Or mentioning that sending multiple untested versions > will move their series to the bottom of the queue. I have some doubts WRT setting in stone (in the doc) the actual patch review order or an explicit "sanctions" system. I think the patch wording allows for more flexibility. /P